User talk:Daniel: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:14, 4 April 2009

width="270px" align="left" valign="top" style="border:solid #User:Daniel/Colour I 1px; font-size:95%; padding: 3pt; background:white"|

Archives

Neonasigoreng

Thanks for blocking this user. I might note that there isn't any sign on his/her talk page of the block. Nor is there any mention of his NeoNazi name (I think it also is a play on Herman Goehring. In any event, his edit history made his intent clear.) which should also be barred. I know this is beating a dead horse but . . . Thanks again. P.S., I rather enjoyed your page. If you have any thoughts on Frank Murphy (a hobby of mine, and given your legal background, perhaps you have some insight) I'd appreciate your input. Best regards from the other side of the world. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 13:48, 2 April 2009 (UTC) Stan[reply]

The reason I didn't bother with a block notice on the talk page was because they're a blatant vandal who quite clearly knew what they were doing; what I did forget to add was {{indefblocked}} (so that it gets put in CAT:TEMP and will be deleted in a month or so). Thanks for reminding me of that one :)

I would suggest he would have been blocked for his username had he not been vandalising anyways; however, vandalism blocks don't allow the user to return under a new username, whereas username blocks do (see {{usernameblock}}), so it's probably better to block him for vandalism as the highest infraction that occured.

Cheers, Daniel (talk) 22:32, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attack usernames

When I look at Versus22's contributions, I notice evidence that material has been oversighted. Based on the comment you left at Versus22's user talk page, the usernames were removed due to the fact that they were attack usernames. Were those usernames removed from Special:ListUsers as well? -- IRP ☎ 02:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 :I would suggest he would have been blocked for his username had he not been vandalising anyways; however, vandalism blocks don't allow the user to return under a new username, whereas username blocks do (see {{t1|usernameblock}}), so it's probably better to block him for vandalism as the highest infraction that occured.
 :Cheers, [[User:Daniel|Daniel]] ([[User talk:Daniel#top|talk]]) 22:32, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
+== Attack usernames ==
+When I look at [[Special:Contributions/Versus22|Versus22's contributions]], I notice evidence that material has been oversighted. Based on <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AVersus22&diff=281263776&oldid=281165755 the comment you left at Versus22's user talk page]</span>, the usernames were removed due to the fact that they were attack usernames. Were those usernames removed from [[Special:ListUsers]] as well? -- [[User:IRP|IRP]] [[User talk: IRP|☎]] 02:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)