User talk:ReyBrujo: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:::In case you didn't realize, in Nintendogs the dogs are the protagonists. Do you think, in example, the [[Charmed]] article would be useful saying "The series have a bunch of witches fighting devils." only? -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 02:30, 13 November 2005 (UTC) |
:::In case you didn't realize, in Nintendogs the dogs are the protagonists. Do you think, in example, the [[Charmed]] article would be useful saying "The series have a bunch of witches fighting devils." only? -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 02:30, 13 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
::::They are not main characters. There is not plot. You are just raising puppies. The fact that you mostly interact with them does not make them main characters. These are generic dogs, not a single dog in the game is programmed to be more important than the other, and no single does has a pre-programmed name that you can get. Anyway, the only difference between the dogs are appearance and, sometimes, whether they need different shampoo and brushes. They are not distinguishable. This information belongs on Wikibooks. The fact of the matter is that going into detail on what dogs are in what game is not important. What is important is to educate them about the game. You gave an argument saying that it should be on Wikipedia because more people go there. We don't put definitions on Wikipedia instead of Wiktionary, do we? - [[User:A Link to the Past|A Link to the Past]] [[User talk:A Link to the Past|(talk)]] 02:40, 13 November 2005 (UTC) |
::::They are not main characters. There is not plot. You are just raising puppies. The fact that you mostly interact with them does not make them main characters. These are generic dogs, not a single dog in the game is programmed to be more important than the other, and no single does has a pre-programmed name that you can get. Anyway, the only difference between the dogs are appearance and, sometimes, whether they need different shampoo and brushes. They are not distinguishable. This information belongs on Wikibooks. The fact of the matter is that going into detail on what dogs are in what game is not important. What is important is to educate them about the game. You gave an argument saying that it should be on Wikipedia because more people go there. We don't put definitions on Wikipedia instead of Wiktionary, do we? - [[User:A Link to the Past|A Link to the Past]] [[User talk:A Link to the Past|(talk)]] 02:40, 13 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
:::::Oh, my... that must be one of the worst arguments I have ever read. With it, no game article should have information about characters because they are just the same character with slight modifications. I will call for a survey to solve that conflict. Obviously, you see no reason except yours, something I already realized when you wanted to delete all FFVI character articles because the AW:DS ones were being deleted. -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 03:30, 13 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:30, 13 November 2005
Welcome, from Journalist
Welcome!
Hi ReyBrujo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
Welcome from Repayne
Nice work on the Dragonlance characters. --Repayne 01:41:24, 2005-09-08 (UTC)
- Thank you, I am trying to add/edit/finish at least one article per day, especially those which are not really updated. That is why I try to stay away from Raistlin and Tasslehoff, and pay more attention to the others. -- ReyBrujo 03:13, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
CT stuff
holy crud you've added so much stuff to the CT-related pages over the last couple of days. Great job! Peaceman 02:22, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Most has already been written, spent most of the time wikifying and rewording to make it easier for non native speakers. I am proud to say I bought the game two months after it was released in the US (USD 105, only MK2 costed me more, USD 110), as soon as I found it, and will gladly do anything in order to share with others what I believe, along with Final Fantasy VI, the best RPG ever released for any console. -- ReyBrujo 03:32, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
Nintendogs.
Let me explain. Wikipedia is not for guide content. A list of dogs available in which games belongs on Nintendogs' Wikibook. That's what the Wikibooks page is for. - A Link to the Past (talk) 01:51, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- The name of the protagonist belong to the article. Their long description may not. See games like Street Fighter II, Advance Wars: Dual Strike, Final Fantasy VI... TV series and movies like Charmed, Lost, The Terminator... The list of dogs is necessary for the user to understand the differences between the games. And since the information is not long enough to need its own list, it fits in the article. -- ReyBrujo 02:02, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- Where ever did you get the idea that breeds of dogs are considered protoganists? Here, allow me to replace the big list.
Each version has their own default dogs.
There. Short and sweet, and accomplishes the same end result, better. - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:20, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- In case you didn't realize, in Nintendogs the dogs are the protagonists. Do you think, in example, the Charmed article would be useful saying "The series have a bunch of witches fighting devils." only? -- ReyBrujo 02:30, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- They are not main characters. There is not plot. You are just raising puppies. The fact that you mostly interact with them does not make them main characters. These are generic dogs, not a single dog in the game is programmed to be more important than the other, and no single does has a pre-programmed name that you can get. Anyway, the only difference between the dogs are appearance and, sometimes, whether they need different shampoo and brushes. They are not distinguishable. This information belongs on Wikibooks. The fact of the matter is that going into detail on what dogs are in what game is not important. What is important is to educate them about the game. You gave an argument saying that it should be on Wikipedia because more people go there. We don't put definitions on Wikipedia instead of Wiktionary, do we? - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- Oh, my... that must be one of the worst arguments I have ever read. With it, no game article should have information about characters because they are just the same character with slight modifications. I will call for a survey to solve that conflict. Obviously, you see no reason except yours, something I already realized when you wanted to delete all FFVI character articles because the AW:DS ones were being deleted. -- ReyBrujo 03:30, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- They are not main characters. There is not plot. You are just raising puppies. The fact that you mostly interact with them does not make them main characters. These are generic dogs, not a single dog in the game is programmed to be more important than the other, and no single does has a pre-programmed name that you can get. Anyway, the only difference between the dogs are appearance and, sometimes, whether they need different shampoo and brushes. They are not distinguishable. This information belongs on Wikibooks. The fact of the matter is that going into detail on what dogs are in what game is not important. What is important is to educate them about the game. You gave an argument saying that it should be on Wikipedia because more people go there. We don't put definitions on Wikipedia instead of Wiktionary, do we? - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- In case you didn't realize, in Nintendogs the dogs are the protagonists. Do you think, in example, the Charmed article would be useful saying "The series have a bunch of witches fighting devils." only? -- ReyBrujo 02:30, 13 November 2005 (UTC)