Jump to content

User talk:K.Khokhar: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
K.Khokhar (talk | contribs)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:


Yes there is quite a large problem with this kind of POV against Pakistanis and quite often also against Islam by some users, a lot of the time the 'vandalism' is by Indians. This was also one of the reasons why the British Pakistani page was originally started as the British Asian page was constantly vandalised. The pov pushers had a lot of support, I suppose they have a large enough population. Most of them refuse to understand reason and so it's only a mater of time before they get banned, I also notice the editor 'nishkid' has started trying to stop wikireader's pov attitude somewhat. Thanks for the links, I will try to go through them and fix as much as I can. [[User:K.Khokhar|Khokhar]] ([[User talk:K.Khokhar#top|talk]]) 21:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes there is quite a large problem with this kind of POV against Pakistanis and quite often also against Islam by some users, a lot of the time the 'vandalism' is by Indians. This was also one of the reasons why the British Pakistani page was originally started as the British Asian page was constantly vandalised. The pov pushers had a lot of support, I suppose they have a large enough population. Most of them refuse to understand reason and so it's only a mater of time before they get banned, I also notice the editor 'nishkid' has started trying to stop wikireader's pov attitude somewhat. Thanks for the links, I will try to go through them and fix as much as I can. [[User:K.Khokhar|Khokhar]] ([[User talk:K.Khokhar#top|talk]]) 21:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Please try as i fear more and more pov pushers are gaining confidence by the action of the Indian vandal yellowmonkey is also now showing pakistaniphobias they wont even let me edit about british indians and there social issues so its clear that respected editors like nishkid are actively supporting vandals giving warnings doesnt work he needs to be banned [[Special:Contributions/81.151.100.127|81.151.100.127]] ([[User talk:81.151.100.127|talk]]) 09:18, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nishkid64&diff=prev&oldid=286598536 this link shows you than wikireader has already got fans also a indian monkey [[Special:Contributions/81.151.100.127|81.151.100.127]] ([[User talk:81.151.100.127|talk]]) 09:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


==[[Direct Action Day]]==
==[[Direct Action Day]]==

Revision as of 09:22, 28 April 2009

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dealing with wikireader

British Pakistani another pov pusher this time indian american has made it his life mission to deface pakistanis everywhere covertly adding original research to degrade pakistanis calling them terrorists and poor amongst others i urge you to delete all his trash and beware hes being backed by a indian admin by the name of nishkid its a solid nexus of indian vandals which needs to be broken cheers. Also if you take a look at the article it states that bengalis suffer the most from low incomes but the article British Bengalis is absent of any mention of this low income statistic its clear that this indian is singling out pakistanis what makes it worse is that admins of hindu origin are also siding with him take a look at the diffs [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] i also gave him a taste of his medicine by adding info on the British Indian article about the scourge of indian cultural caste system which irked both the vandal and his admin supporter they both changed the edit stating they are "cleaning it up" to make the issue look less of problem and immediately added that indians are rich above it in the new economic status sub heading self comforting indian propaganda lol well lets hope india reduces its poverty rate back home instead of abroad lol maybe lakshmi mittal can provide homes for the slumdogs in mumbai lol ;-) 86.158.235.93 (talk) 19:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Yes there is quite a large problem with this kind of POV against Pakistanis and quite often also against Islam by some users, a lot of the time the 'vandalism' is by Indians. This was also one of the reasons why the British Pakistani page was originally started as the British Asian page was constantly vandalised. The pov pushers had a lot of support, I suppose they have a large enough population. Most of them refuse to understand reason and so it's only a mater of time before they get banned, I also notice the editor 'nishkid' has started trying to stop wikireader's pov attitude somewhat. Thanks for the links, I will try to go through them and fix as much as I can. Khokhar (talk) 21:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please try as i fear more and more pov pushers are gaining confidence by the action of the Indian vandal yellowmonkey is also now showing pakistaniphobias they wont even let me edit about british indians and there social issues so its clear that respected editors like nishkid are actively supporting vandals giving warnings doesnt work he needs to be banned 81.151.100.127 (talk) 09:18, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nishkid64&diff=prev&oldid=286598536 this link shows you than wikireader has already got fans also a indian monkey 81.151.100.127 (talk) 09:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your posting in the talk page of the above mentioned article. Please see the reply. Also, please go through the sources mentioned in the article (some of them are available online, fortunately).

And also, if you have any reliable source presenting/enforcing your point of view, please cite them. As for now, the article just relates whatever the sources tell, there is nothing made up. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 01:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. I will try to reply to the article shortly. Please note that I am not trying to enforce a point of view, rather trying to keep the article balanced and accurate.Khokhar (talk) 07:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]