User talk:The Red

Christopher Hitchens and talkpage

The material I removed from the article on Christopher Hitchens was stolen from: [1] as I explained in my edit summaries. You need to be a little more hesitant before you revert. Also, it's generally considered bad form to delete the comments on your talkpage. If you want, you can archive them with a link on your talkpage. 96.241.20.150 (talk) 03:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Noted and the warning has been removed from your talk page (if not done so already.) Also, it is complete within my rights to remove any and all comments (except for blocks of course) from my own talk page. [2] talk ProSpider 03:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Woolooware High School

Why did you undo your removal of vandalism to this article? Drmies (talk) 05:28, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

I believe it was a Huggle error as I remember incorrectly reverting mistaken vandalism on another article, I might have hit that article in mistake. I see now that it is true vandalism, thanks for your undo. prospider‡ 05:30, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

No problem. There's more problems than that with that article anyway. Take it easy, Drmies (talk) 05:36, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Danny Gokey

Hey Spider, after you warned this IP, sternly and solemnly, they vandalized the page again, here and here. Do you carry the big administrator's stick? Drmies (talk) 18:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

I do not. If you want to report an IP for vandalism, use WP:AIV or you can contact an administator such as Mentifisto. prospider‡ 18:22, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Nor do I. I'll drop them a line, thanks. Drmies (talk) 19:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Award for being swell

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		I salute you for doing the best you can :) Mrpotatohead 2 (talk) 21:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Keep up the good work and keep smiling Mrpotatohead 2 (talk) 21:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, I will continue to do my part. Keep on trucking! The Red╬ 21:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Super Audio CD

Your recent editing history at Super Audio CD shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 22:14, 4 May 2009 (UTC)