Jump to content

English Poor Laws: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 83: Line 83:


When the new Amendment was applied to the industrial North of [[England]] (an area the law had never considered during reviews), the system failed catastrophically as many found themselves temporarily unemployed, due to recessions or a fall in stock demands, so called 'cyclical unemployment' and were reluctant to enter a Workhouse, despite it being the only method of gaining aid.
When the new Amendment was applied to the industrial North of [[England]] (an area the law had never considered during reviews), the system failed catastrophically as many found themselves temporarily unemployed, due to recessions or a fall in stock demands, so called 'cyclical unemployment' and were reluctant to enter a Workhouse, despite it being the only method of gaining aid.
[[File:Workhouse Nantwich.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Although many deterrent [[workhouses]] developed in the period after the [[New Poor Law]], some had already been built under the existing system.<ref>http://www2.rgu.ac.uk/publicpolicy/introduction/historyf.htm</ref> This [[workhouse]] in [[Nantwich]], [[Cheshire]] dates from 1780, over fifty years before the passing of the [[Poor Law Amendment Act]].]]

The abuses and shortcomings of the system are documented in the novels of [[Charles Dickens]] and [[Frances Trollope]]. Despite the aspirations of the reformers, the New Poor Law was unable to make the Workhouse as bad as life outside. The primary problem was that in order to make the diet of the Workhouse inmates "less eligible" than what they could expect outside, it would be necessary to starve the inmates beyond an acceptable level.<ref>http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/eligibil.htm,</ref> It was for this reason that other ways were found to deter entrance to the Workhouses. These measures ranged from the introduction of prison style uniforms to the segregation of 'inmates' into yards - there were normally male, female, boy and girls yards.
The abuses and shortcomings of the system are documented in the novels of [[Charles Dickens]] and [[Frances Trollope]]. Despite the aspirations of the reformers, the New Poor Law was unable to make the Workhouse as bad as life outside. The primary problem was that in order to make the diet of the Workhouse inmates "less eligible" than what they could expect outside, it would be necessary to starve the inmates beyond an acceptable level.<ref>http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/eligibil.htm,</ref> It was for this reason that other ways were found to deter entrance to the Workhouses. These measures ranged from the introduction of prison style uniforms to the segregation of 'inmates' into yards - there were normally male, female, boy and girls yards.


Revision as of 23:44, 5 May 2009

File:Walnutree Hospital Former Workhouse.jpg
Many former workhouses now house hospitals. Walnutree Hospital, Sudbury, Suffolk (pictured) was formerly the Sudbury Union Workhouse.[1]

The English Poor Laws[2] were the system of poor relief which existed in England and Wales[3] from the reign of Elizabeth I[4] to the emergence of the modern welfare state after the Second World War.[5] Historian Mark Blaug has argued the Poor Law system provided "a welfare state in miniature, relieving the elderly, widows, children, the sick, the disabled, and the unemployed and underemployed".[6]

English Poor Law legislation can be traced back as far as 1536 when legislation was passed to deal with the impotent poor although there is much earlier Tudor legislation dealing with the problems of vagrants and beggars.[7] The history of the Poor Law in England is usually divided between two major statutes, the Old Poor Law passed during the reign of Elizabeth I[8] and the New Poor Law passed in 1834 which significantly modified the existing system of poor relief.[9] This transition altered the Poor Law system from one administered haphazardly at the parish level to a highly centralised system which encouraged the large scale development of workhouses by Poor Law Unions. [10]

The Poor Law was not formally abolished until the 1948 National Assistance Act with parts of the law remaining on the statute book until 1967.[11] However the Poor Law system fell into decline at the beginning of the 20th century after the introduction of the Liberal welfare reforms, the growth of friendly societies and the introduction of reforms which bypassed the Poor Law system.

Origins

Main article: Tudor Poor Law
The Poor Laws in the aftermath of the Black Death (pictured), when labour was in short supply, were concerned with making the able bodied work.[12]

The origins of the English Poor Law system can be traced as far back as the fifteenth century. Monasteries were in decline and their eventual dissolution during the Reformation caused poor relief to move from a largely voluntary basis to a compulsory tax that was collected at a parish level.[13] Early legislation was concerned with vagrants and making the able-bodied work, especially while labour was in short supply following the Black Death. Specific legislation was passed which prevented private individuals from giving poor relief to able-bodied paupers. In 1388, the Statute of Cambridge was passed, making each individual parish responsible for administering poor relief to the impotent poor.[14]

Tudor attempts to tackle the problem originate during the reign of Henry VII. In 1495, Parliament passed a statute ordering officials to seize "[a]ll such vagabonds, idle and suspected persons living suspiciously and then so taken and set in stocks, there to remain by the space of three days and three nights to have none other sustenance but bread and water, and there after the said three days and three nights, to be had out and set at large and then to be commanded to avoid the town."[citation needed] No remedy to the problem of poverty was offered by this; it was merely swept from sight, or moved from town to town. Moreover, no distinction made between vagrants and the jobless; both were simply categorised as "sturdy beggars", to be punished and moved on.

In 1530, during the reign of Henry VIII, a proclamation was issued, describing idleness as the "mother and root of all vices" and ordering that whipping should replace the stocks as the punishment for vagabonds.[citation needed] This change was confirmed in statute the following year, with one important change: a distinction was made between the "impotent poor" and the sturdy beggar, giving the old, the sick and the disabled licence to beg. Still no provision was made, though, for the healthy man simply unable to find work. All able-bodied unemployed were put into the same category. Those unable to find work had a stark choice: starve or break the law. In 1535, a bill was drawn up calling for the creation of a system of public works to deal with the problem of unemployment, to be funded by a tax on income and capital. Though supported by the king, it was savaged in Parliament. The following year, an Act was passed that placed responsibility for the elderly and infirm with the parish or municipal authorities, though provision was reliant on voluntary donations.

For the able-bodied poor, life became even tougher during the reign of Edward VI. In 1547, a bill was passed that subjected vagrants to some of the more extreme provisions of the criminal law, namely two years servitude and branding with a "V" as the penalty for the first offence and death for the second. Justices of the Peace were reluctant to apply the full penalty and there is no evidence that the act was ever enforced before it was repealed in 1550.[citation needed]. The government of Elizabeth I, Edward VI's successor after Mary I, was also inclined to severity. An Act passed in 1572 called for offenders to be bored through the ear for a first offence and that persistent beggars should be hanged. However, the Act also made the first clear distinction between the "professional beggar" and those unemployed through no fault of their own. The first complete code of poor relief was made in the Act For the Relief of the Poor 1597 and some provision for the "deserving poor" was eventually made in the Elizabethan Poor Law of 1601. The more immediate origins of the Elizabethan Poor Law system were deteriorating economic circumstances in Sixteenth century England. Historian George Boyer has stated that England suffered rapid inflation at this time caused by population growth, the debasement of coinage and the inflow of American silver.[15] Poor harvests in the period between 1595-98 causing the numbers in poverty to increase while charitable giving decreased after the dissolution of the Monasteries and disillusion of religious guilds.[16]

Old Poor Law

Main article: Elizabethan Poor Law 1601
Further information: Settlement Act 1662, Knatchbull's Act, and Gilbert's Act
The Old Poor Law or Elizabethan Poor Law[17] is sometimes referred to as the "43rd Elizabeth"[18] as it was passed in the 43rd year that Elizabeth I (pictured) reigned as Queen.

The Elizabethan Poor Law[19] of 1601 formalized earlier practices of poor relief contained the the Act For the Relief of the Poor 1597 yet is often cited as the beginning of the Old Poor Law system.[20] It created a system administered at parish level,[21] paid for by levying local rates on rate payers.[22] Relief for those too ill or old to work, the so called 'impotent poor', was in the form of a payment or items of food ('the parish loaf') or clothing also known as outdoor relief. Some aged people might be accommodated in parish alms houses, though these were usually private charitable institutions. Meanwhile able-bodied beggars who had refused work were often placed in a Houses of Correction or even subjected to beatings to mend their attitudes. Provision for the many able-bodied poor in the workhouse, was relatively unusual, and most workhouses developed later . The 1601 Law said that poor parents and children were responsible for each other, elderly parents would live with their children.

The Old Poor Law was a parish based system,[23] there were around 1,500 such parishes based upon the area around a parish church. The system allowed for despotic behavior from the Overseers of the Poor[24] but as Overseers of the Poor would know their paupers they were considered able to differentiate between the deserving and undeserving poor making the system both more humane and initially more efficent.[25] The Elizabethan Poor Law operated at a time when the population was small enough for everyone to know everyone else, therefore people's circumstances would be known and the idle poor would be unable to claim on the parishes' poor rate. The system provided social stability yet by 1750 needed to be adapted to cope with population increases,[26] greater mobility and regional price variations.

The 1601 Act sought to deal with 'settled' poor who had found themselves temporarily out of work - it was assumed they would accept indoor relief or outdoor relief. Neither method of relief was at this time in history seen as harsh. The act was supposed to deal with beggars whom were considered a threat to civil order. The Act was passed at a time when poverty was considered necessary as fear of poverty made people work.In 1607 a House of Correction was set up in each county. However this system was separate from the 1601 system which distinguished between the settled poor and 'vagrants'. There was much variation in the application of the law and there was a tendency for the destitute to migrate towards the more generous parishes, usually situated in the towns.[27] This led to the Settlement Act 1662 also known as the Poor Relief Act 1662, this allowed relief only to established residents of a parish; mainly through birth, marriage and apprenticeship. Unfortunately the laws reduced the mobility of labour and discouraged paupers from leaving their parish to find work.[28] They also encouraged industry to create short contracts (e.g. 364 days) so that an employee could not become eligible for poor relief.[29]

A pauper applicant had to prove a 'settlement'. If they could not, they were removed to the next parish that was nearest to the place of their birth, or where they might prove some connection. Some paupers were moved hundreds of miles. Although each parish that they passed through was not responsible for them, they were supposed to supply food and drink and shelter for at least one night. In 1697 an act was passed requiring the poor to wear a "badge" of red or blue cloth on the right shoulder with an embroidered letter "P" and the initial of their parish.[30] However, this was often disregarded.

The workhouse movement began at the end of the 17th century with the establishment of the Bristol Corporation of the Poor, founded by Act of Parliament in 1696. The corporation established a workhouse which combined housing and care of the poor with a house of correction for petty offenders. Following the example of Bristol, some twelve further towns and cities established similar corporations in the next two decades. As these corporations required a private Act, they were not suitable for smaller towns and individual parishes.

Soliders returning from fighting in the French Wars put pressure on an already overstretched Poor Law system.

Starting with the parish of Olney, Buckinghamshire in 1714 several dozen small towns and individual parishes established their own institutions without any specific legal authorization. These were concentrated in the South Midlands and in the county of Essex. From the late 1710s the Society for the Promotion of Christian Knowledge began to promote the idea of parochial workhouses. The Society published several pamphlets on the subject, and supported Sir Edward Knatchbull in his successful efforts to steer the Workhouse Test Act through parliament in 1723. The act gave legislative authority for the establishment of parochial workhouses, by both single parishes and as joint ventures between two or more parishes. More importantly, the Act helped to publicise the idea of establishing workhouses to a national audience. By 1776 some 1,912 parish and corporation workhouses had been established in England and Wales, housing almost 100,000 paupers. Although many parishes and pamphlet writers expected to earn money from the labour of the poor in workhouses, the vast majority of people obliged to take up residence in workhouses were ill, elderly, or children whose labour proved largely unprofitable. The demands, needs and expectations of the poor also ensured that workhouses came to take on the character of general social policy institutions, combining the functions of creche, and night shelter, geriatric ward and orphanage.In 1782, Thomas Gilbert finally succeeded in passing an Act[31] that established poor houses solely for the aged and infirm and introduced a system of outdoor relief for the able-bodied. This was the basis for the development of the Speenhamland system, which made financial provision for low-paid workers. Settlement Laws were altered by the Removal Act 1795 which prevented non-settled persons from being moved on unless they had applied for relief.[32]

During French Wars it became impossible to import cheap grain into Britain which resulted in the price of bread increasing.[33] As wages did not similarly increase many agricultural labourers were plunged into poverty and the Tory government of Lord Liverpool[34] passed the Corn Laws[35] to keep the price of grain artificially high. 1815 saw great social unrest[36] as the end of the French Wars[37] saw industrial and agricultural depression and high unemployment. Social attitudes to poverty began to change after 1815 and overhauls of the system were considered. The Poor Law system was criticized as distorting the free market and in 1816 a Parliamentary Select Committee looked into altering the system[38] which resulted in the Sturges-Bourne Acts being passed. By 1820, before the passing of the Poor Law Amendment Act workhouses were already being built to reduce the spiraling cost of poor relief.[39] Boyer suggests several possible reasons for the gradual increase in relief given to able-bodied males: the enclosure movement, a decline in industries such as wool spinning and lace making.[40] Boyer also contends that farmers were able to take advantage of the poor law system to shift some of their labour costs onto the tax payer.[41]

Opposition

Main article: Opposition to the Poor Law
Punch Magazine criticized the New Poor Law's workhouses for splitting mothers and their infant children.

Opposition to the Poor Law grew at the beginning of the 19th century. The 1601 system was felt to be too costly[42] and was considered in academic circles as encouraging the underlying problems.[43] Jeremy Bentham argued for a disciplinary, punitive approach to social problems, whilst the writings of Thomas Malthus focused attention on the problem of overpopulation, and the growth of illegitimacy.[44]David Ricardo argued that there was an "iron law of wages". The effect of poor relief, in the view of the reformers, was to undermine the position of the "independent labourer".

In the period following the Napoleonic Wars, several reformers altered the function of the "poorhouse" into the model for a deterrent workhouse. The first of the deterrent workhouses in this period was at Bingham, Notts. The second was Becher's workhouse in Southwell, now maintained by the National Trust. George Nicholls, the overseer at Southwell, was to become a Poor Law Commissioner in the reformed system. The 1817 Report of the Select Committee on the Poor Laws condemned the Poor Law as causing poverty itself.[45]

The introduction of the New Poor Law also resulted in opposition. Some who gave evidence to the Royal Commission into the Operation of the Poor Laws suggested that the existing system had proved adequate and was more adaptable to local needs.[46] This argument was strongest in the industrial North of England and in the textile industries[47] where outdoor relief was a more effective method of dealing with cyclical unemployment as well as being a more cost effective method. Poor Law commissioners faced greatest opposition in Lancashire and the West Riding of Yorkshire where in 1837 there was high unemployment during an economic depression. The New Poor Law was seen as interference from Londoners with little understanding of local affairs.[48] Opposition was unusally strong because committees had already been formed in opposition to the Ten Hours Movement[49], leaders of the Ten Hours campaign such as Richard Oastler,[50][51] Joseph Rayner Stephens and John Fielden[52] became the leaders of the Anti-Poor Law campaign. The Book of Murder was published and was aimed at creating opposition to the workhouse system.[53] and pamphlets were published spreading rumour and propaganda about Poor Law Commissioners and alleged infanticide inside of workhouses.[54]Opposition to the Poor Law yielded some successes in delaying the development of workhouses and one workhouse in Stockport was attacked by a crowd of rioters.[55]As many Boards of Guardians were determined to continue under the old system. The Poor Law Commission granted some boards the right to continue providing relief under the old system. However, the movement against the New Poor Law was short lived leading many to instead turn towards Chartism.[56]

The Royal Commission on the Poor Law

Main article: 1832 Royal Commission into the Operation of the Poor Laws
Nassau William Senior argued for greater centralization of the Poor Law system.

The 1832 Royal Commission into the Operation of the Poor Laws[57] was set up following the widespread destruction and machine breaking of the Swing Riots.[58] The report was prepared by a commission of nine, including Nassau William Senior,[59] and served by Edwin Chadwick as Secretary.[60] The Royal Commission's primary concerns were with illegitimacy (or "bastardy"),[61] reflecting the influence of Malthusians, and the fear that the practices of the Old Poor Law were undermining the position of the independent labourer.[62] Two practices were of particular concern: the "roundsman" system[63], where overseers hired out paupers as cheap labour, and the Speenhamland system, which subsidised low wages without relief.[64] The 13 volume report pointed to the conclusion that the Poor Law was itself was the cause of poverty. The report differentiated between poverty, which was seen as necessary, as it was fear of poverty which made people work, and indigence,the inability to earn enough to live on.

The Commission proposed the New Law be governed by two overarching principles:

  • "less eligibility": that the position of the pauper should have to enter a workhouse with conditions worse than that of the poorest 'free' labourer outside of the workhouse.[65]
  • the "workhouse test", that relief should only be available in the workhouse.[66] The reformed workhouses were to be uninviting, so that anyone capable of coping outside them would choose not to be in one.

When the Act was introduced however it had been partly watered down. The workhouse test and the idea of "less eligibility" were never mentioned themselves and the recommendation of the Royal Commission that 'outdoor relief' (relief given outside of a workhouse)[67] should be abolished - was never implemented. The report recommended separate workhouses for the aged, infirm, children, able-bodied females and able-bodied males. The report also stated that parishes should be grouped into unions in order to spread the cost of workhouses and a central authority should be established in order to enforce these measures. The Poor Law Commission set up by Earl Grey took a year to write its report,[68] the recommendations passed easily through Parliament support by both main parties the Whigs and the Tories. The bill gained Royal Assent in 1834. Of those who opposed the Bill - of whom there were few - were more concerned about the centralisation which the bill would bring rather than the underpinning philosophy of utilitarianism.

New Poor Law

Main article: Poor Law Amendment Act 1834
Further information: Outdoor Labour Test Order, Outdoor Relief Prohibitory Order, and Less eligibility

The Poor Law Amendment Act[69] was passed in 1834 by the government of Lord Melbourne and is considered to be one of the most "far-reaching pieces of legislation of the entire Nineteenth Century"[70] and "classic example of the fundamental Whig-Benthamite reforming legislation of the period".[71] The Act aimed to reduce the burden on rate payers and can be seen as an attempt by the Whig government to win the votes of the classes enfranchised by the Second Reform Act. Despite being labeled an "amendment act" it completely overhauled the existing system[72] and established a Poor Law Commission to oversee the national operation of the system.[73] This included the forming together of small parishes into Poor Law Unions[74] and the building of workhouses in each union for the giving of poor relief. One area not reformed was the financing of the system which continued to be by local poor rates.

The act stated that:[75]

(a) no able-bodied person was to receive money or other help from the Poor Law authorities except in a workhouse;
(b) conditions in workhouses were to be made very harsh to discourage people from wanting to receive help;
(c) workhouses were to be built in every parish or, if parishes were too small, in unions of parishes;
(d) ratepayers in each parish or union had to elect a Board of Guardians to supervise the workhouse, to collect the Poor Rate and to send reports to the Central Poor Law Commission;
(e) the three man Central Poor Law Commission would be appointed by the government and would be responsible for supervising the Amendment Act throughout the country.

[The Poor Law Amendment Act]

The Amendment Act did not ban all forms of outdoor relief.[76] Not until the 1840s would the only method of relief be for the poor to enter a Workhouse. The workhouses were to be made little more than prisons and families were normally separated upon entering a Workhouse.

When the new Amendment was applied to the industrial North of England (an area the law had never considered during reviews), the system failed catastrophically as many found themselves temporarily unemployed, due to recessions or a fall in stock demands, so called 'cyclical unemployment' and were reluctant to enter a Workhouse, despite it being the only method of gaining aid.

Although many deterrent workhouses developed in the period after the New Poor Law, some had already been built under the existing system.[77] This workhouse in Nantwich, Cheshire dates from 1780, over fifty years before the passing of the Poor Law Amendment Act.

The abuses and shortcomings of the system are documented in the novels of Charles Dickens and Frances Trollope. Despite the aspirations of the reformers, the New Poor Law was unable to make the Workhouse as bad as life outside. The primary problem was that in order to make the diet of the Workhouse inmates "less eligible" than what they could expect outside, it would be necessary to starve the inmates beyond an acceptable level.[78] It was for this reason that other ways were found to deter entrance to the Workhouses. These measures ranged from the introduction of prison style uniforms to the segregation of 'inmates' into yards - there were normally male, female, boy and girls yards.

Fierce hostility and organised opposition from workers, politicians and religious leaders eventually led to the Amendment Act being amended, removing the very harsh measures of the Workhouses to a certain degree. The Andover workhouse scandal,[79] where conditions in the Andover Union Workhouse were found to be inhumane and dangerous, prompted a government review and the abolition of the Poor Law Commission which was replaced with a Poor Law Board which meant that a Committee of Parliament was to administer the Poor Law, with a cabinet minister as head. Despite this another scandal occurred over inhumane treatment of paupers in Huddersfield.[80]

After the New Poor Law

Main article: Poor Law policy after the New Poor Law
Further information: Poor Law Commission, Poor Law Board, and Local Government Board
Infighting between Edwin Chadwick and other Poor Law Commissioners was one reason for an overhaul of Poor Law administration.


After 1847 the Poor Law Commission was replaced with a Poor Law Board.[81] This was because of the Andover workhouse scandal and the criticism of Henry Parker who was responsible for the Andover union as well as the tensions in Somerset House caused by Chadwick's failure to become a Poor Law Commissioner. The Poor Law had been altered in 1834 because of increasing costs. The Union Chargeability Act was passed in 1865[82] in order to make the financial burden of pauperism be placed upon the whole unions rather than individual parishes. Most Boards of Guardians were middle class and committed to keeping Poor Rates as low as possible.After the Reform Act 1867 there was increasing welfare legislation. As this legislation required local authorities' support the Poor Law Board was replaced with a Local Government Board in 1871.[83] The Local Government Board led a crusade against outdoor relief supported by the Charity Organisation Society, an organization which viewed outdoor relief as destroying the self-reliance of the poor.[84] The effect of this renewed effect to deter outdoor relief was to reduce claimants by a third and to increase numbers in the work house by 12-15%.[85] County Councils were formed in 1888, District Councils in 1894. This meant that public housing, unlike health and income maintenance, developed outside the scope of the Poor Law. The infirmaries and the workhouses remained the responsibility of the Guardians until 1930. This change was in part due to changing attitudes on the nature and causes of poverty - there was for the first time an attitude that society had a responsibility to protect its more vulnerable members.

Decline and abolition

Main article: Decline and abolition of the Poor Law system
Further information: Liberal welfare reforms and Interwar poverty in Britain
The Liberal welfare reforms were implemented outside of the Poor Law system and paved the way for the eventual abolition of the Poor Law.

The Poor Law system began to decline with the availability of over forms of assistance. The growth of friendly societies provided help for its members without recourse to the Poor Law system. Some trade unions also provided help for their members. In 1886 the Chamberlain Circular encouraged the Local Government Board to set up work projects when unemployment rates were high rather than use workhouses. In 1905 the Conservatives passed the Unemployed Workman Act which provided for temporary employment for workers in times of unemployment.[86]

In 1905 a Royal Commission was set up to investigate what changed could be made to the Poor Law.[87] The Commission produced two conflicting reports and both investigations were largely ignored the the Liberal government when implementing their own scheme of welfare legislation. The welfare reforms of the Liberal Government 1906-14[88] made several provisions to provide social services without the stigma of the Poor Law, including Old age pensions and National Insurance, and from that period fewer people were covered by the system.[89] Means tests were developed during the inter-war period, not as part of the Poor Law, but as part of the attempt to offer relief that was not affected by the stigma of pauperism. According to Lees by slowly dismantling the system the Poor Law was "to die by attrition and surgical removals of essential organs".[90]

Numbers using the Poor Law system increased during the interwar years and between 1921-38 despite the extension of unemployment insurance to virtually all workers expect the self-employed. Many of these workers ere provided with outdoor relief. One aspect of the Poor Law that continued to cause resentment was that the burden of poor relief was not shared equally by rich and poor areas but, rather, fell most heavily on those areas in which poverty was at its worst. This was a central issue in the Poplar Rates Rebellion led by George Lansbury and others in 1921.[91]

Poverty in the interwar years (1918-1939) was responsible for several measures which largely killed off the Poor Law system. Workhouses were officially abolished by the Local Government Act 1929,[92]and between 1929-1930 Poor Law Guardians, the "workhouse test" and the term "pauper" disappeared.The Unemployment Assistance Board was set up in 1934 to deal with those not covered by the earlier 1911 National Insurance Act passed by the Liberals and by 1937 the able-bodied poor had been absorbed into this scheme. By 1936 only 13% of people were still receiving poor relief in some form of institution.[93] In 1948 the Poor Law system was finally abolished with the introduction of the modern welfare state and the passing of the National Assistance Act.[94]

Historiography

Main article: Historiography of the Poor Laws

See also

References

  1. ^ http://www.bures-online.co.uk/workhouse/workhouse.htm
  2. ^ http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/boyer.poor.laws.england
  3. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/plintro.html
  4. ^ http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/boyer.poor.laws.england
  5. ^ http://www2.rgu.ac.uk/publicpolicy/introduction/historyf.htm
  6. ^ Blaug, Mark. "The Poor Law Report Re-examined." Journal of Economic History (1964) 24: 229-45
  7. ^ http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/boyer.poor.laws.england
  8. ^ http://www.institutions.org.uk/poor_law_unions/the_poor_law1.htm
  9. ^ http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/Lpoor1834.htm
  10. ^ http://www.workhouses.org.uk/
  11. ^ http://www.workhouses.org.uk/
  12. ^ http://www.uakron.edu/law/docs/quigley.pdf
  13. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/elizpl.html
  14. ^ www.workhouses.org.uk - The Workhouse Web Site
  15. ^ http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/boyer.poor.laws.england
  16. ^ Slack, Paul. The English Poor Law, 1531-1782. London: Macmillan, 1990.
  17. ^ http://www.elizabethan-era.org.uk/the-poor-law.htm
  18. ^ http://www.nhshistory.net/regions_&_districts.htm
  19. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/elizpl.html
  20. ^ http://workhouses.org/
  21. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/plaa.htm,
  22. ^ http://www.mdlp.co.uk/resources/general/poor_law.htm
  23. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/parishmap2.html
  24. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/justify.htm,
  25. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/justify.htm,
  26. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/social/pop.htm
  27. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/plaa.htm
  28. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/settle.html
  29. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/plaa.htm
  30. ^ http://www.thepotteries.org/dates/poor.htm
  31. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/gilbert.html
  32. ^ http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/boyer.poor.laws.england,
  33. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/plintro.html
  34. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/pms/Liverpool.html
  35. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/cornlaws1.html,
  36. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/c-eight/distress/distress.htm
  37. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/c-eight/france/waterloo.htm,
  38. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/changes.html,
  39. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/changes.html
  40. ^ http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/boyer.poor.laws.england
  41. ^ Boyer, George R. An Economic History of the English Poor Law, 1750-1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.,
  42. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/plaa.htm
  43. ^ http://www.mdx.ac.uk/WWW/STUDY/SSH5.HTM,
  44. ^ Huzel, James, Malthus, the Poor Law, and Population in Early Nineteenth-Century England, University of Kent, The Economic History Review Volume 22 Issue 3, Pages 430 - 452, Published Online: 11 Feb 2008
  45. ^ Boyer, George, An economic history of the English poor law, 1750-1850, p58, ISBN-10: 0521364795
  46. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/ellison.htm
  47. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/plaa.htm
  48. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/antiplm.htm,
  49. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/factmine/factory.htm
  50. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/oastler2.htm
  51. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/hudunion.htm
  52. ^ Knott, J, Popular Opposition to the 1834 Poor Law, p95, ISBN-10: 0709915322
  53. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/bom.htm,
  54. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/attacks.htm
  55. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/periodicals/iln/38c.html,
  56. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/antiplm.htm,
  57. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/royalcom.html
  58. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/ruralife/swing.htm
  59. ^ http://homepage.newschool.edu/het//profiles/senior.htm
  60. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/chad1.html
  61. ^ http://www.econlib.org/library/YPDBooks/Reports/rptPLC.html
  62. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/plevils.htm
  63. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/speen.html
  64. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/royalcom.html
  65. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/eligibil.htm
  66. ^ http://www2.rgu.ac.uk/publicpolicy/introduction/historyf.htm
  67. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/plaatext.htm
  68. ^ http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/Lpoor1834.htm
  69. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/poorlaw.htm
  70. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/plintro.html
  71. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/plaatext.html
  72. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/changes.html,
  73. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/plcommiss.html
  74. ^ http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/types/status_page.jsp?unit_status=PLU
  75. ^ 1834 Poor Law
  76. ^ http://www.learningcurve.gov.uk/victorianbritain/caring/default.htm
  77. ^ http://www2.rgu.ac.uk/publicpolicy/introduction/historyf.htm
  78. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/eligibil.htm,
  79. ^ http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/andover.html
  80. ^ http://www.historyhome.co.uk/peel/poorlaw/huddscand.htm
  81. ^ http://www.institutions.org.uk/poor_law_unions/the_poor_law1.htm,
  82. ^ http://agreg-ink.net/civi/2005/morris5.html
  83. ^ http://library-2.lse.ac.uk/archives/handlists/CollMisc0231/CollMisc0231.html,
  84. ^ http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/boyer.poor.laws.england,
  85. ^ http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/boyer.poor.laws.england,
  86. ^ http://www.learningcurve.gov.uk/britain1906to1918/timeline/g2_timeline.htm
  87. ^ Englander, D., Poverty and Poor Law Reform in 19th Century Britain, 1834-1914, (1998)
  88. ^ http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/history/mwh/britain/liberalreformsrev1.shtml,
  89. ^ http://www.learningcurve.gov.uk/britain1906to1918/g2/background.htm
  90. ^ Lees, Lynn Hollen. The Solidarities of Strangers: The English Poor Laws and the People, 1770-1948. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  91. ^ http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/george-lansbury-at-the-heart-of-old-labour-by-john-shepherd-605420.html
  92. ^ M. A. Crowther, The workhouse system 1834-1929, ISBN-10: 0416360904
  93. ^ http://www.thepotteries.org/local_history/010.htm
  94. ^ http://www2.rgu.ac.uk/publicpolicy/introduction/historyf.htm
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=English_Poor_Laws&oldid=288161190"