Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/BAFTA Academy Fellowship Award/archive1

BAFTA Academy Fellowship Award

Nominator(s): The Rambling Man (talk) 17:21, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

• Featured list candidates/BAFTA Academy Fellowship Award/archive1

Another award list. It's as well cited as I can find without tomes of television/film paper-based references. It's illustrated, factually accurate and a lot better looking (and ten times bigger than) when I first found it. Interested to see what folks think of the format and the references. I'll do the usual, i.e. work 24/7/365 to address concerns raised. Much love to you, FL community.... The Rambling Man (talk) 17:21, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Truco

Comments from Truco (talk · contribs) General Dabs and external links check out fine with the checker tools. Lead The Academy Fellowship is an award given out by the British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA) since 1971 "in recognition of outstanding achievement in the art forms of the moving image", and is regarded the most prestigious of the BAFTA awards given to individuals. -- 1)The bold title should be the title of the article, and Academy Fellowship is not the title. 2)+as before the most Reprhased. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:58, 10 July 2009 (UTC) Is The Fellowship an official shortening of the full name of the award? Reworded to avoid this. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:58, 10 July 2009 (UTC) The only person to have been awarded the Fellowship award posthumously is Stanley Kubrick who was made a fellow in 2000, having died the previous year. -- Comma after Stanley Kubrick Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:58, 10 July 2009 (UTC) Four new fellows were created at the most recent ceremony in 2009; comedy actress duet Dawn French and Jennifer Saunders, Python and director Terry Gilliam and Nolan Bushnell, the founder of Atari Inc. -- 1)created? Is that the official way to state that? (I've never heard of it) Reworded. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:58, 10 July 2009 (UTC) Why not state in the lead something about the nationalities, like the most fellows from a certain country.--Truco 503 17:52, 10 July 2009 (UTC) That's borderline trivia in my opinion. The significance is the fellow and their form of work mainly. But we'll see if anyone else thinks that their nationality is relevant. Thanks for your comments. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:58, 10 July 2009 (UTC) Well if that's so, then what's the point of even mentioning the nationalities in the table?--Truco 503 01:25, 12 July 2009 (UTC) It's additional information. I just don't believe that number of British or French or whatever winners is particularly notable, especially not for inclusion in the lead. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC) I just thought a small note saying the vast majority of them were from the UK wouldn't hurt, but its your call.--Truco 503 19:18, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

• Support -- Previous issues resolved/clarified; list now meets WP:WIAFL.