User talk:Theodore7

A welcome from Sango123

Hello, Theodore7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
• Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Simplified Ruleset
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Wikipedia Glossary

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango123 (talk) 22:58, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

I'm glad you liked the welcome! If you need anything, feel free to drop by. By the way, please type four tildes (~~~~) after your messages on talk pages. It generates a signature showing your username and a timestamp, which will look like this: Theodore7 10:41, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Cheers, Sango123 (talk) 20:33, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

No problem! Glad to be of service. :) Sango123 (talk) 21:25, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Four reverts on Nostradamus

Hey, since you're new, I'm sure you didn't know about this, but you've violated the three revert rule on the Nostradamus article. Admins can block you for that, so please stop reverting others' changes. Thanks. (diffs: [1] [2] [3] [4]) —BorgHunter (talk) 03:18, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Answer: Perhaps if you would cease playing games by making POV changes to the already written additions (you've made more than several reverts yourself) then it would not be required to make certain that your POV additions are deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theodore7 (talk • contribs)

I didn't make the edits you were reverting. And I'm positive I haven't violated the 3RR. There's no need to be combative—I'm trying to help you, and further help Wikipedia by trying for consensus on the talk page and NPOV in the article. —BorgHunter (talk) 03:27, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Ok, then someone out there is making POV edits and railing on astrology in a manner that is not objective - but combative and

Wikipedia is a resource, and not a personal forum for such crusades. I appreciate the help. As for consensus, I am all for that, as long as it doesn't turn into POV opinions being passed on as facts. Theo 03:38, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Good. Can we agree not to touch that second paragraph anymore? It's accurate as it stands. —BorgHunter (talk) 03:39, 16 December 2005 (UTC)