Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alias Eclipse: Difference between revisions
Creating deletion discussion page for Alias Eclipse. (TW) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{findsources|Alias Eclipse}}) |
:({{findsources|Alias Eclipse}}) |
||
I cannot find significant coverage of this subject in [[WP:RS|reliable independent sources]], therefore it does not meet the [[WP:GNG|notability guidelines]]. Contested PROD. <small><span style="border: 1px solid; background-color:darkblue;">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background-color:darkblue; color:#FFFFFF"> Chzz </span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B; background-color:yellow; border: 0px solid; "> ► </span>]]</span></small> 14:50, 29 September 2009 (UTC) |
I cannot find significant coverage of this subject in [[WP:RS|reliable independent sources]], therefore it does not meet the [[WP:GNG|notability guidelines]]. Contested PROD. <small><span style="border: 1px solid; background-color:darkblue;">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background-color:darkblue; color:#FFFFFF"> Chzz </span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B; background-color:yellow; border: 0px solid; "> ► </span>]]</span></small> 14:50, 29 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
'''This is abusive: you have obviously not searched. A google search of "alias eclipse" returns nearly 4,000 links from various sources of information about this software program. It was widely known in the visual effects industry and is notable enough to be included on Wikipedia. And I might add that it is certainly more notable than some of the articles that you have chosen to add to Wikipedia, such as "Red Cunt Hair" and "Boothill Foottappers." A quick glance at your contributions reveal several two-sentence articles about obscure topics with only one or two references. These do not warrant Wikipedia entries and I will have them deleted.'''--[[User:Ajerimez|Ajerimez]] ([[User talk:Ajerimez|talk]]) 15:21, 29 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:21, 29 September 2009
- Alias Eclipse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I cannot find significant coverage of this subject in reliable independent sources, therefore it does not meet the notability guidelines. Contested PROD. Chzz ► 14:50, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
This is abusive: you have obviously not searched. A google search of "alias eclipse" returns nearly 4,000 links from various sources of information about this software program. It was widely known in the visual effects industry and is notable enough to be included on Wikipedia. And I might add that it is certainly more notable than some of the articles that you have chosen to add to Wikipedia, such as "Red Cunt Hair" and "Boothill Foottappers." A quick glance at your contributions reveal several two-sentence articles about obscure topics with only one or two references. These do not warrant Wikipedia entries and I will have them deleted.--Ajerimez (talk) 15:21, 29 September 2009 (UTC)