User talk:Tstormcandy

Welcome!

Hello, Tstormcandy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! ➜Redvers^{talk  ❝It's bona to vada your dolly old eek❞} 07:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Greeting to Would-Be Message Deliverers

Hello! I will attempt to reply to any messages left as soon as I get a chance to. Feel free to post regarding any objections I may have caused with content, confusions left in WP:AFD discussions, or disagreements in clean-up edits; I will be more than happy to look into the matter further and address any mistakes I may have made. Best wishes! Datheisen (talk)

Galveston Bay Area

Thanks for your input!

For what it's worth the article has come under fire more than once since I started expanding it. Though certainly my writing is not perfect, IMHO, the criticisms have more had to do with biases against the subject matter. Most of the original critics have since mostly backed off and some have even become supportive (which I much appreciate).

The current RfC is the result of one editor raising major concerns and being unwilling to back down from them or really even discuss them. Nsaum75 put out the RfC to try to help the situation by soliciting more input and build a concensus.

--Mcorazao (talk) 17:12, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

It seems you've agreed to not do any further edits so at least there's no fuss about needing any sort of protection on the article itself. Cheers~ Datheisen (talk) 17:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but that's just a stop-gap solution. I had refrained from edits for about 3 weeks previously to let things calm down. I had thought when I got neutral peer-review feedback I could safely start editing again but the whole war started up again. So I stopped again. I want to push this toward GA but essentially until this settles out I'm stuck. --Mcorazao (talk) 17:59, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Exmortis 3

Hello Datheisen, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Exmortis 3 - a page you tagged - because: Not unambiguously promotional. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:52, 20 October 2009 (UTC)