User talk:Disinfoboxman

Redirect to:

• User:Disinfoboxman

Inappropriate comments at Featured article review

Use of Disinfoboxman at Featured article review pages, WP:POINT

• Featured article review, Augustan drama
  • 20:35, 9 October 2008 - With edit summary fuckwits, makes comment Delete. No infobox. Also various incorrect commas, and missing dashes - Sarcastic comment by Disinfoboxman at Featured article review, saying a Featured article should be deleted because it is missing an infobox.

• Featured article review, Great Fire of London
  • 11:49, 10 November 2008 - Delete - no infobox. Anyway, Bloodworth was right: a woman could have pissed it out, if only one with a prodigiously large bladder had been located in time. - Sarcastic comment by Disinfoboxman at Featured article review, saying a Featured article should be deleted because it is missing an infobox.

• Featured article review, Oroonoko
  • 12:43, 15 October 2009 - Delete. Far too good for the likes of Wikipedia these days. A few of Geogre's featured articles have not been torpedoed yet: who will be the first to find fault with Ormulum or Colley Cibber or Jonathan Wild?

• Featured article review, Augustan literature
  • 11:44, 12 November 2008 - Delete. No infobox. Also various incorrect commas, and missing dashes. - Sarcastic comment by Disinfoboxman at Featured article review, saying a Featured article should be deleted because it is missing an infobox.
  • 15:30, 12 November 2008 - I am not going to fix it either, because 3/ like you, I am one of those people "just talking" who doesn't care enough to do anything about it. I suspect we may disagree about whether such "failure" is very important.
• Featured article review, Colley Cibber

• • 11:26, 19 November 2009 - Delete with maximum prejudice - no disinfobox at all, unlike many far more important articles - Sarcastic comment by Disinfoboxman at Featured article review, saying a Featured article should be deleted because it is missing an infobox.
  • 19:29, 19 November 2009 - Well, I'm sure there is a word for it. Delete - remove, expunge, erase, efface, cancel, wipe out, excise, eradicate, obliterate. Surely we can't keep featured articles by a notoriously "abusive sockpuppet", can we? Particularly if they don't have the requisite density of footnotes, or have too many adjectives. - Reference by Disinfoboxman to the account Utgard Loki (talk · contribs), sock of Geogre (talk · contribs) [1]. (Geogre had used the Utgard Loki account in a similar fashion, to make inappropriate comments at Featured article review pages, while saying with his main account that he was uninterested in participating in the FAR process.)

---

These are all inappropriate comments at Featured article review. Obviously you do not wish for the Featured articles to be deleted, and obviously you do not wish for them to have infoboxes. Please stop using this account in this inappropriate manner at FAR. This is a violation of WP:POINT, usage of this account to post "Delete, no infobox!" at multiple FAR pages of Featured articles that you clearly feel should remain FAs and should not have infoboxes. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 08:40, 24 November 2009 (UTC)