Eduard Hanslick: Difference between revisions
more to the point and other tweaks |
→Views on music: "possibly" doesn't cut it |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Hanslick's tastes were conservative; in his memoirs he said that for him musical history really began with Mozart and culminated in Beethoven, Schumann and Brahms. He is best remembered today for his critical advocacy of Brahms as against the school of Wagner, an episode in 19th century music history sometimes called the [[War of the Romantics]]. The critic [[Richard Pohl]], of the ''[[Neue Zeitschrift für Musik]]'', represented the progressive composers of the "[[Music of the Future]]". |
Hanslick's tastes were conservative; in his memoirs he said that for him musical history really began with Mozart and culminated in Beethoven, Schumann and Brahms. He is best remembered today for his critical advocacy of Brahms as against the school of Wagner, an episode in 19th century music history sometimes called the [[War of the Romantics]]. The critic [[Richard Pohl]], of the ''[[Neue Zeitschrift für Musik]]'', represented the progressive composers of the "[[Music of the Future]]". |
||
Being a close friend of Brahms from 1862, Hanslick possibly had some influence on Brahms's music, often getting to hear new music before it was publicly premièred. Hanslick saw Wagner's reliance on dramatics and word-painting as inimical to the nature of music, which he thought to be expressive solely by virtue of its form, and not through any extra-musical associations. The theoretical framework of Hanslick's criticism is expounded in his book of 1854, ''Vom Musikalisch-Schönen'' (''On the Musically Beautiful''), which started as an attack on the Wagnerian aesthetic and established itself as an influential text, subsequently going through many editions and translations in several languages. Other targets for Hanslick's heavy criticism were [[Anton Bruckner]] and [[Hugo Wolf]]. Of [[Tchaikovsky]]'s ''[[Violin Concerto (Tchaikovsky)|Violin Concerto]]'', he accused composer and soloist [[Adolph Brodsky]] of putting the audience "through hell" with music "which stinks to the ear"; he was also luke-warm towards the same composer's Sixth Symphony.<ref>Hanslick (1963), pp. 302-3</ref> |
Being a close friend of Brahms from 1862, Hanslick possibly had some influence on Brahms's music {{Citation needed|date=January 2010}}, often getting to hear new music before it was publicly premièred. Hanslick saw Wagner's reliance on dramatics and word-painting as inimical to the nature of music, which he thought to be expressive solely by virtue of its form, and not through any extra-musical associations. The theoretical framework of Hanslick's criticism is expounded in his book of 1854, ''Vom Musikalisch-Schönen'' (''On the Musically Beautiful''), which started as an attack on the Wagnerian aesthetic and established itself as an influential text, subsequently going through many editions and translations in several languages. Other targets for Hanslick's heavy criticism were [[Anton Bruckner]] and [[Hugo Wolf]]. Of [[Tchaikovsky]]'s ''[[Violin Concerto (Tchaikovsky)|Violin Concerto]]'', he accused composer and soloist [[Adolph Brodsky]] of putting the audience "through hell" with music "which stinks to the ear"; he was also luke-warm towards the same composer's Sixth Symphony.<ref>Hanslick (1963), pp. 302-3</ref> |
||
{{wikiquote}} |
{{wikiquote}} |
||
Revision as of 18:37, 28 January 2010
Eduard Hanslick (September 11, 1825–August 6, 1904) was a Bohemian-Austrian music critic.
Biography
Hanslick was born in Prague, the son of Joseph Adolph Hanslick, a bibliographer and music teacher from a German-speaking family, and one of his piano pupils, the daughter of a Jewish merchant from Vienna. At the age of 18 Hanslick went to study music with Václav Tomášek, one of Prague's renowned musicians. He also studied law at Prague University and obtained a degree in that field, but his amateur study of music eventually led to writing music reviews for small town newspapers, then the Wiener Musik-Zeitung and eventually the Neue Freie Presse, where he was music critic until retirement. Whilst still a student, in 1845, he met with Richard Wagner in Marienbad; the composer, noting the young man's enthusiasm, invited him to Dresden to hear his opera Tannhäuser; here Hanslick also met with Robert Schumann.[1]
In 1854 he published his influential book On the Beautiful in Music. By this time his interest in Wagner had begun to cool; he had written a disparaging review of the first Vienna production of Lohengrin. From this point on, Hanslick found his sympathies moving away from the so-called 'music of the Future' associated with Wagner and Liszt, and more towards music he conceived as directly descending from the traditions of Mozart, Beethoven and Schumann[2] — in particular the music of Johannes Brahms (who dedicated to him his set of waltzes opus 39 for piano duet). In 1869, in a revised edition of his essay Jewishness in Music, Wagner attacked Hanslick as 'of gracefully concealed Jewish origin', and asserted that his Jewish style of criticism was anti-German.[3] It is sometimes claimed that Wagner caricatured Hanslick in his opera Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg as the carping critic Beckmesser.
Hanslick's unpaid lectureship at the University of Vienna led in 1870 to a full professorship for history and aesthetic of music and later to a doctorate in honoris causa. Hanslick often served on juries for musical competitions and held a post at the Austrian Ministry of Culture and fulfilled other administrative roles. He retired after writing his memoirs, but still wrote articles on the most important premières of the day, up to his death in 1904 in Baden.
Views on music
Hanslick's tastes were conservative; in his memoirs he said that for him musical history really began with Mozart and culminated in Beethoven, Schumann and Brahms. He is best remembered today for his critical advocacy of Brahms as against the school of Wagner, an episode in 19th century music history sometimes called the War of the Romantics. The critic Richard Pohl, of the Neue Zeitschrift für Musik, represented the progressive composers of the "Music of the Future".
Being a close friend of Brahms from 1862, Hanslick possibly had some influence on Brahms's music [citation needed], often getting to hear new music before it was publicly premièred. Hanslick saw Wagner's reliance on dramatics and word-painting as inimical to the nature of music, which he thought to be expressive solely by virtue of its form, and not through any extra-musical associations. The theoretical framework of Hanslick's criticism is expounded in his book of 1854, Vom Musikalisch-Schönen (On the Musically Beautiful), which started as an attack on the Wagnerian aesthetic and established itself as an influential text, subsequently going through many editions and translations in several languages. Other targets for Hanslick's heavy criticism were Anton Bruckner and Hugo Wolf. Of Tchaikovsky's Violin Concerto, he accused composer and soloist Adolph Brodsky of putting the audience "through hell" with music "which stinks to the ear"; he was also luke-warm towards the same composer's Sixth Symphony.[4]
See also
Works (German editions)
- Eduard Hanslick, "Vom Musikalisch-Schönen". Leipzig 1854 (online version)
- Eduard Hanslick, "Geschichte des Konzertwesens in Wien", 2 vol. Vienna 1869-70
- Eduard Hanslick, "Die moderne Oper", 9 vol. Berlin 1875-1900
- Eduard Hanslick, "Aus meinem Leben", 2 vol. Berlin 1894
- Eduard Hanslick, "Suite. Aufsätze über Musik und Musiker". Vienna 1884
References
- Eduard Hanslick, ed. and int. Henry Pleasants, Music Criticism 1846-99, Harmondsworth 1963.
- Ambros Wilhelmer, "Der junge Hanslick. Sein 'Intermezzo' in Klagenfurt 1850-1852". Klagenfurt 1959
- Ludvová, Jitka. Dokonalý antiwagnerián Eduard Hanslick. Paměti/Fejetony/Kritiky (Praha 1992).