User talk:Zengar Zombolt: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:32, 12 February 2010

allkpop

allkpop.com is first and foremost a blog. It is a news blog, yes, but a blog. It tends to be biased, publishes rumours as fact, and has misleading stories. It really doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards for reliable sources.

I know it's difficult to find a good English sources for K-Pop, but that doesn't mean that poorer ones should be used instead. If you look at the Oh! (album) page, you'll see that an English (actual) news source is used. So it's doable. Normally speaking, though, Korean news sources are used instead on most of these pages.

I hope that clears things up. Let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. SKS (talk) 03:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

You left a templated WP:COI warning on Steve Baker's talk page. In case you are not aware, it is not considered good form on WP to template the long-term users, and there are few contributors more regular or more prolific that Mr Baker. If you have a question about something he is doing, a personal note citing your specific concern is much more likely to attract an appropriate response. As an aside, one does not have a conflict of interest just because one has a personally-related interested in a topic, or no one with a heart condition could write about Cardiac care, or photographers about photography. Bielle (talk) 23:15, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You also left a COI warning tag on User_talk:Niaz in a similar fashion. In the tag text, you claimed that User:Niaz was involved in editing the article, but a look at his contributions reveals that he has not edited the article in the last 2 years, nor do his comments in the talk page indicate any involvement with the research or any personal suffering from the syndrome. Discussing the article in the talk page is not a conflict of interest, so you should refrain from tagging user talk pages with such frivolous warnings. The message from Bielle above indicates that this was not an isolated case. If you have issues, discuss it in the article talk page. Thank you. --Ragib (talk) 23:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Bielle. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 23:32, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 You also left a COI warning tag on [[User_talk:Niaz]] in a similar fashion. In the tag text, you claimed that [[User:Niaz]] was involved in editing the article, but a look at his contributions reveals that he has not edited the article in the last 2 years, nor do his comments in the talk page indicate any involvement with the research or any personal suffering from the syndrome. Discussing the article in the talk page is not a conflict of interest, so you should refrain from tagging user talk pages with such frivolous warnings. The message from Bielle above indicates that this was not an isolated case. If you have issues, discuss it in the article talk page. Thank you. --[[User:Ragib|Ragib]] ([[User talk:Ragib|talk]]) 23:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
+==No personal attacks==
+[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors, as you did on [[:User talk:Bielle]]. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa1 --> [[User:TJRC|TJRC]] ([[User talk:TJRC|talk]]) 23:32, 12 February 2010 (UTC)