Status paradox: Difference between revisions
m wikilink |
Paradoctor (talk | contribs) →References: convert to WP:LDR |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{refs |
{{reflist|refs= |
||
<ref name="HIV">[http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:g2ulVs5ZIy0J:www.colorado.edu/ibs/aps/past_colloquia/WBCA_2009_%2520Full%2520Program.pdf+%22status+paradox%22&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShwtgMrPxHYQJKbcttMfdZrKySt3U8_5nux05BWEfBLFOshP1Ddv_WG8sfhdYxvpbdA3D82ZNeKcGinlvzn-g--aAjA03Iux69IYhhY30TO1q7GIotmuTe1QcUGIofBuBA1OdeJ&sig=AHIEtbTlI5pGW2JHin05anlEjFd0nRjsrA "Exploring the Wealth and HIV Status Paradox among African Youth" - 7th Wits/Brown/Colorado/APHRC Colloquium]</ref> |
|||
<ref name="Health">[http://books.google.com/books?id=bqYaXGvsZrEC&pg=PA178&lpg=PA178&dq=%22status+paradox%22&source=bl&ots=BIzGGxsmvH&sig=r7I81Y1Ph4ucYYD5KECyw9wP7XI&hl=en&ei=5J-mS7eNCYbYsQOZ4_Qi&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CBEQ6AEwBDgo#v=onepage&q=%22status%20paradox%22&f=false "Baby boomer health dynamics: how are we aging?" - Google Books]</ref> |
|||
}} |
|||
==External links== |
==External links== |
Revision as of 19:56, 23 March 2010
An editor has nominated this article for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it. |
This article may document a neologism or protologism in such a manner as to promote it. (November 2009) |
A status paradox is a theory that illustrates the concept of a subject caught between two mutually exclusive classes.[1][failed verification] It can also be used as a term for a situation where a higher class level is having more detrimental effects occurring to them that should be more widespread in lower classes, but isn't.[2]Furthermore, it can be used to explain a paradox between two subjects that should not be the way they are.[3]
Types of Status Paradoxes
There are many different ways a status paradox can form, whether socially, culturally, or in some other manner entirely.
Status Paradox of Migration
This type of status paradox describes how a migration of peoples can alter the status of these peoples, either higher or lower.
An example is a migration of laboring migrants from southern countries, such as Mexico. Their ability to work is considered qualified by the standards of their home country, but is much diminished in the new country they come to. This causes their social status to drop in their new country of living, while their level of education or training held them in a higher social circle in their country of origin. This type of status inconsistency creates the paradox of the migrants being qualified for two different social classes at the same time, but they can only use each class if they are within the boundaries of where it is relevant.[1]
Wealth and HIV Status Paradox
For higher classes with greater amount of wealth, it is naturally assumed that they will have less of a chance of acquiring infectious diseases because they have the money to stop the spread of such diseases. Meanwhile, lower classes with less amounts of wealth will not be able to afford treatments to stop the spread of diseases and might even not be knowledgeable about dangerous diseases that they might be catching, so they are at a higher likelihood of catching and spreading various diseases.[2]
However, this is not the case in Africa with HIV. The upper class, instead, are the ones that have the highest percentage of HIV infection, specifically 15-29 year olds. This creates a type of status paradox, having a "disease of affluence", associated with differing class levels.[2]
Gender and Status Paradox
Gender, within the realm of economics and business, has long been a dividing factor in terms of wages and management. The use of humor by women in management is one method of relieving the tension created from women being in charge over men, which is seen as a status paradox.[4]
Lifestyle-Health Status Paradox
For people in the United States, obesity has been a growing trend. The formation of a healthy lifestyle is a viewpoint that is generally not attributed to Americans. From such increases in weight, diabetes, asthma, and migraines have grown more common. However, offsetting this somewhat, the number of people contracting cardiovascular disease and other chronic diseases has been dropping for the age range of Americans that are at a higher likelihood of being obese. This status paradox does not correlate with the evidence that shows such rates should be increasing, not decreasing.[3]
References
- ^ a b "Theorising Transnational Migration. The Status Paradox of Migration" - Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity
- ^ a b c "Exploring the Wealth and HIV Status Paradox among African Youth" - 7th Wits/Brown/Colorado/APHRC Colloquium
- ^ a b "Baby boomer health dynamics: how are we aging?" - Google Books
- ^ Journal of Applied Communication Research, Vol. 32, No. 2, May 2004, pp. 147–170, "Humor in Middle Management: Women Negotiating the Paradoxes of Organizational Life" - Google Docs alternative source at SJSU
External links
- Balogh, Beatrix (2006). "The Status Paradox – The Development of Puerto Rico's Legal Status from Colony to Commonwealth and Beyond" (PDF). Elsö Század. 5 (2). Budapest, Hungary: University of Budapest [1]: 11–49. ISSN 1419-5127. Retrieved 22 March 2010.
{{cite journal}}
: External link in
(help)|publisher=
- "Youth and the transition to adult status: Uganda" - SpringLink
- "Informed consent in embryonic stem cell research: Are we following basic principles?" - PubMed
- "Ethnic conflict without ethnic groups: a study in pure sociology" - InterScience
- "Jewish Influence in Popular Culture" - Jewish Tribal Review
- "Gyro Rrëshen summer evening in a optikën German etnologu" - Republic of Albania
- "Methodological transnationalism and the paradox of migration: simultaneous incorporation and social status among Ghanaian migrants in Germany" - EASA Biennial Conference 2006
- "IT Investment Decisions: Value, Uncertainty and Gut Feeling" - Google Docs