Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Plymouth Argyle F.C. Player of the Year/archive2

Plymouth Argyle F.C. Player of the Year

Plymouth Argyle F.C. Player of the Year (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/Plymouth Argyle F.C. Player of the Year/archive1
• Featured list candidates/Plymouth Argyle F.C. Player of the Year/archive2

Nominator(s): Argyle 4 Life^talk 19:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

I have based this list on similar Featured Lists such as Ipswich Town F.C. Player of the Year and Watford F.C. Player of the Season, and I believe it now meets the criteria. Thanks. Argyle 4 Life^talk 19:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

• Comment I supported last time and probably will again if there have been improvements. I do want to check a few things just to make sure everything is feature quality before making a !vote.

To start with

• Dablinks is good.
• http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page=Plymouth_Argyle_F.C._Player_of_the_Year Checklinks] shows to suspicious as probable 404s but they check out. One did not work earlier even though it does now so the site might be having issues.
• Alt viewer shows it is taken care of. I am under the impression that this was dropped from the criteria but just to make it better: Try adding something baout the first guy's hair or something to clarify that it is dated. Try adding a mention to Wotton like "with his arms raised triumphantly".Cptnono (talk) 05:24, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
• Any dashes are OK with the MoS.Cptnono (talk) 05:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

• I've added some more alternative text to the lead image and Wotton's as suggested. Argyle 4 Life^talk 12:18, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Commment Sandman888 (talk) ^{Latest PR} 20:52, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

• This list is essentially a content fork of "List of Plymouth Argyle F.C. players", being a reduced duplicate of the information there. While the AfD of York was a keep, many of the keep-arguments concerned the lists FL status being a sufficient guarantee against 3.b, however this is not the case here, so it would take novel arguments as to why this content fork is acceptable. I defer my oppose until a case has been made.
• "Plymouth Argyle Hall of Fame" delink Plymouth Argyle.

• There is some crossover between the two but I don't believe that is a reason to fail/delete. The main "List of players" inclusion criteria is 100 appearances but I wanted to include POTY winners/Hall of Famers because they are undeniably notable. The award is only mentioned briefly so if a reader wondered how a winner is picked and this list didn't exist then they would be stuck. Merely adding it on to the bottom of the list is a non-starter for me because the "List of players" is long enough already and both will continue to grow as time progresses. WP:CF backs up my belief in the lead. Delinked name in Table key. Argyle 4 Life^talk 12:18, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure if I'm going to review this, due to a close association with this strand of lists. What I will say is that if an AfD survived solely on the grounds that WP:FOOTY editors didn't want to see an FL deleted, that would not be a valid close. If you believe that has happened, you should seek to clarify the decision at deletion review. --WFC-- 04:36, 21 August 2010 (UTC)