Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Viriditas/Fox News Channel reverts and disruption: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:27, 7 October 2010

User:Viriditas/Fox News Channel reverts and disruption

Unless this is being used for an RFC (which I'm highly doubt) this appears to be simply a hit list of those w/whom Viriditas has had disagreements with. Soxwon (talk) 23:08, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as being too full of negative wording abut editors (such as "false edit summary" etc). Would !vote "keep" if all identities were redacted, and negative comments removed. Collect (talk) 23:51, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Was the edit summary accurate in reflecting the edit made? If not, 'false' is the correct word to be using. My reading indicates that the edit summary was indeed 'false,' as in 'not true.' Also noting Collect's obvious self-interest here (I would likely have the same self interest; not a judgement). → ROUX ₪ 23:55, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - for now. This is an ongoing issue, as raised by Magog the Ogre at ANI. Viriditas needs to indicate what this page is being used for, exactly, before deletion is appropriate. That you doubt there is an RfC forthcoming is not evidence. Once Viriditas indicates whether or not there is an RfC or ArbCom case coming, deletion or not can be discussed. Suggest that if Viriditas plans on filing such a thing, it be done within a reasonable amount of time. Say, two weeks. → ROUX ₪ 23:55, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- comment IOW, if no action is filed by October 27 (3 weeks) using this as an evidence page, that the vote is "delete"? Collect (talk) 00:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Most likely. That would depend on what Viriditas has to say. → ROUX ₪ 00:04, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep: Wow, should I be scared that some random user is going to pop around my userspace and start listing things for deletion? This is ridiculous. He is completely entitled to his own opinion, especially within his own userspace. Please go do something useful for a change - please? Like I dunno, write an encyclopedia, and keep editor opinions be? ResMar 03:27, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 **'''comment''' IOW, if no action is filed by October 27 (3 weeks) using this as an evidence page, that the vote is "delete"? [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 00:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 ***Most likely. That would depend on what Viriditas has to say. →&nbsp;[[User:Roux|<span style="color:#4B0082;font-size:80%;">'''ROUX'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Roux|<span style="color:#4B0082;">'''₪'''</span>]]<small>&nbsp;00:04, 7 October 2010 (UTC)</small>
+'''Strong Keep''': Wow, should I be scared that some random user is going to pop around my userspace and start listing things for deletion? This is ridiculous. He is completely entitled to his own opinion, especially within his own userspace. Please go do something useful for a change - please? Like I dunno, write an encyclopedia, and keep editor opinions be? <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#731A25">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="#B31023">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 03:27, 7 October 2010 (UTC)