Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Swamp Percussion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:26, 12 October 2010

Black Swamp Percussion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article lacks reliable sources verifying the notability of this organization, and I wasn't able to find appropriate sources to add with my own search. Prod removed by creator with the comment, "All information has been check for accuracy by the owner of the companies, Eric Sooy," but without the addition of sources or information about the company's notability. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 10:35, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although not the original author of the article, I represent the company and have expanded and added factual references.

Teliosis (talk) 13:25, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – At this time. One of the core requirements for an article here at Wikipedia is that the subject must meet notability standards as stated; “…A company, corporation, organization, school, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. “ I was only able to find a few articles, (5) in a Google News search, which mentioned the company and a majority of those were in trade journals. I saw no references to major contributions by the company that influenced the industry – individuals or other organizations. Sorry to say, at this point, the company is non-notable.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 *Although not the original author of the article, I represent the company and have expanded and added factual references.
 [[User:Teliosis|Teliosis]] ([[User talk:Teliosis|talk]]) 13:25, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' – At this time.  One of the core requirements for an article here at Wikipedia is that the subject must meet notability standards as stated; “…A company, corporation, organization, school, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. “  I was only able to find a few articles, (5) in a [[Google News]] search, which mentioned the company and a majority of those were in trade journals.  I saw no references to major contributions by the company that influenced the industry – individuals or other organizations.  Sorry to say, at this point, the company is non-notable.