Jump to content

Authoritarian personality: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Validity: Remove Ray's comments - fringe
A50000 (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 394075981 by The Four Deuces (talk)
Line 20: Line 20:
After extensive questionnaire research and statistical analysis, Altemeyer found that only three of the original nine hypothesized components of the model correlated together: authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism.<ref>[[Robert Altemeyer|Altemeyer, B.]] (1981). ''Right-wing authoritarianism''. University of Manitoba Press. ISBN 978-0887551246 </ref>
After extensive questionnaire research and statistical analysis, Altemeyer found that only three of the original nine hypothesized components of the model correlated together: authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism.<ref>[[Robert Altemeyer|Altemeyer, B.]] (1981). ''Right-wing authoritarianism''. University of Manitoba Press. ISBN 978-0887551246 </ref>


Despite its methodological deficiencies, the theory of the authoritarian personality has had a major influence on research in political, personality, and social psychology. In Germany, authoritarianism has been recently studied by Klaus Roghmann, Detlef Oesterreich, and Christel Hopf. One of the most active researchers in the field today is the Dutch psychologist J.D. Meloen.
Despite its methodological deficiencies, the theory of the authoritarian personality has had a major influence on research in political, personality, and social psychology. In Germany, authoritarianism has been recently studied by Klaus Roghmann, Detlef Oesterreich, and Christel Hopf. One of the most active researchers in the field today is the Dutch psychologist J.D. Meloen. One of the most active critics of the theory has been Australian psychologist John J. Ray.{{Citation needed|date=January 2010}} Ray is known for statement that Adolf Hitler was not a conservative but in fact a Socialist.<ref>http://jonjayray.tripod.com/hitler.html</ref>


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 16:54, 1 November 2010

This article describes the psychological trait of authoritarianism. For the form of government that bears the same name, see Authoritarianism

The authoritarian personality is an influential theory of personality developed by University of California, Berkeley psychologists, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel Levinson, and Nevitt Sanford and the German emigre sociologist and philosopher Theodor W. Adorno, in their 1950 book of the same name. The personality type is defined by nine traits that were believed to cluster together as the result of psychodynamic, childhood experiences. These traits are conventionalism, authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, anti-intraception, superstition and stereotypy, power and "toughness," destructiveness and cynicism, projectivity, and exaggerated concerns over sexuality (sexual repression).[1] In brief, the authoritarian is predisposed to follow the dictates of a strong leader and traditional, conventional values.

The authors of The Authoritarian Personality, having escaped from Europe during WWII, became interested in the study of anti-semitism. They advertised for volunteers and administered a battery of questionnaires. They selected the most anti-semitic and least anti-semitic of the volunteers and discarded the mid-group. They then contrasted the remaining two groups, coming up with the F-scale, which measures the basic traits of the authoritarian personality.

Recently, John Dean made use of the theory to analyze the contemporary political climate in his book Conservatives without Conscience. The updated refinement of the authoritarian personality concept is the concept of Right-wing authoritarianism brought fourth by Robert Altemeyer in 1981.

Psychoanalytic aspects

Adorno and his colleagues regarded the fundamental basis of the authoritarian personality in terms of Freud's psychoanalytic theory, with an emphasis on early childhood experiences as the driving force of personality development. Psychoanalytic theory suggests that young children internalize the values of their fathers as a result of the unconscious, traumatic conflicts. From this process, the superego develops. Grappling with a strict, authoritarian father leads to the development of a very strong super-ego. Thereby, from the earliest childhood onward, unconscious desires and drives must be repressed and remain unsatisfied.

The unconscious conflicts that are unleashed are solved when a person projects the "forbidden" drives and aggressions of his superego onto other people. As a rule, ethnic, political, or religious minorities are selected as a screen for these psychological projections, because there are fewer social sanctions to fear. Authoritarians can often fall back on socially acceptable prejudices.

Alfred Adler provided another perspective, linking the "will to power over others" as a central neurotic trait, usually emerging as aggressive over-compensation for felt and dreaded feelings of inferiority and insignificance. According to this view, the authoritarian needs to maintain control and prove superiority over others is rooted in a worldview populated by enemies and empty of equality, empathy, and mutual benefit.

Validity

Soon after the publication of The Authoritarian Personality, the theory became the subject of many criticisms. Theoretical problems involved the psychoanalytic interpretation of personality, and methodological problems focused on the inadequacies of the F-scale. Another criticism is that the theory of the Berkeley group insinuates that authoritarianism exists only on the right of the political spectrum. As a result, some have claimed that the theory is corrupted by political bias. Kreml found that the anti-authoritarian personality had the same personality characteristics as the authoritarian personality[2].

After extensive questionnaire research and statistical analysis, Altemeyer found that only three of the original nine hypothesized components of the model correlated together: authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism.[3]

Despite its methodological deficiencies, the theory of the authoritarian personality has had a major influence on research in political, personality, and social psychology. In Germany, authoritarianism has been recently studied by Klaus Roghmann, Detlef Oesterreich, and Christel Hopf. One of the most active researchers in the field today is the Dutch psychologist J.D. Meloen. One of the most active critics of the theory has been Australian psychologist John J. Ray.[citation needed] Ray is known for statement that Adolf Hitler was not a conservative but in fact a Socialist.[4]

See also

References

  1. ^ Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper and Row (pp. 228). ISBN 978-0393300420
  2. ^ Kreml, William P. (1977). The anti-authoritarian personality. Oxford ; New York : Pergamon Press.ISBN 978-0080210636
  3. ^ Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press. ISBN 978-0887551246
  4. ^ http://jonjayray.tripod.com/hitler.html