User talk:56tyvfg88yju

lets talk

Hi

Hi, i am jivesh from Mauritius,. I usually edit Beyonce pages on Wikipedia. I am currently working on "Single Ladies" and i want to promote it to FA but i need help. I saw your comments about "Halo" and i think you know very well how to shorten certain paragraphs. I want you to help me with Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It). Please, i will really be grateful if you help me. Single Ladies also does not have a lot of information about recording currently but i found a reliable link from which i can develop the section........ http://www.modernbeats.com/hit-talk/single-ladies-beyonce-music-production/. So will you help me? Have a look at the article and tell me what you think about. I know it is not perfect but i am working on it and no one is helping me for the time being. Just see how the article was tow weeks ago http://www.modernbeats.com/hit-talk/single-ladies-beyonce-music-production/ and now. Compare. I'll be waiting for a reply. Thank you. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 07:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello

I appreciate your review and am glad you show an interest in improving Painted turtle! I, however, am having a hard time understanding where some of your concerns are coming from. For instance, what seems "rushed" about us submitting for FA? We went through the entire article carefully for about six weeks: generating over 440 KB of talk page content. And, which parts of the article seem "immature" to you? Could you please point out specific passages so me and my fellow nominator can effectively address your concern? Thank you.--NYMFan69-86 (talk) 01:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Olivia Shakespear

I'm taking your points into consideration and will respond on the GA page as well, but wanted to give you a demonstration of my frustration with the review process here. Last October I brought this version of Ezra Pound to FAC and it was opposed for insufficient detail. The opposing reviewer has since rewritten the article and I'll let you have a look and decide for yourself regarding the level of detail. I agree to some extent that the Olivia article is overly detailed, but on the other hand, what to do if I go to FAC and am told it has insufficient detail? Rewrite it again? Essentially I haven't that much free time in my life, so am happy to let this go for now. The rest I'll add to the GA page. Thanks. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 21:26, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

FAC

Please cut the nonsense at FAC. Ideally, we would like to be able to get your feedback on nominations without the accompanying drama. For example, suggesting nominators withdraw is normally reserved for overtly poor articles that have no business even being nominated. If you identify problems, it's usually sufficient to oppose and list your reasons. If your goal is to have to community decide that you are violating WP:POINT and that you need to be blocked or banned from content processes, you are moving in that direction with all speed. --Andy Walsh (talk) 19:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)