Talk:Newtonian mechanics: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
lack of rigor |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::I also believe it also deserves it's own section, primarily because there are other ways of doing classical mechanics besides Newton's F=ma, particularly using Hamiltonian and Lagrangian methods. It might be a good idea to point this out here, while also aknowledging that often Newtonian Mechanics and Classical Mechanics are terms which in many circumstances are used interchangably, even if there are some differences in scope. [[User:Ssiruuk25|DAG]] 17:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC) |
:::I also believe it also deserves it's own section, primarily because there are other ways of doing classical mechanics besides Newton's F=ma, particularly using Hamiltonian and Lagrangian methods. It might be a good idea to point this out here, while also aknowledging that often Newtonian Mechanics and Classical Mechanics are terms which in many circumstances are used interchangably, even if there are some differences in scope. [[User:Ssiruuk25|DAG]] 17:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
"They should be merged |
"They should be merged |
||
== lack of rigor == |
|||
not rigurous. |
|||
first: |
|||
check out Bozunov Formulas |
|||
Revision as of 13:42, 27 February 2006
Should this be merged with Classical mechanics? Nightwatch 21:28, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Surely as one of the most remarkable developments that eventually shaped the industrial revolution of the western world this needs to be provided a separate treatment. 81.111.172.198 00:58, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
- it should be merged. --MarSch 11:57, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
- agreed --1698
- I believe that it is important enough to have its own section, but that in its present state it doesn't have enough information to be a separate entry. I believe that the articles should be merged or that information should be added to this one. Raoulharris 17:25, 16 January 2006 (UTC)::
- I also believe it also deserves it's own section, primarily because there are other ways of doing classical mechanics besides Newton's F=ma, particularly using Hamiltonian and Lagrangian methods. It might be a good idea to point this out here, while also aknowledging that often Newtonian Mechanics and Classical Mechanics are terms which in many circumstances are used interchangably, even if there are some differences in scope. DAG 17:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- I believe that it is important enough to have its own section, but that in its present state it doesn't have enough information to be a separate entry. I believe that the articles should be merged or that information should be added to this one. Raoulharris 17:25, 16 January 2006 (UTC)::
"They should be merged
lack of rigor
not rigurous.
first:
check out Bozunov Formulas