User talk:Methinx: Difference between revisions
m Added {{W-graphical}} template to user talk page. using Friendly |
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
|} |
|} |
||
== A topic of interest to you is covered by Arbcom sanctions == |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose, at their own discretion, [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|sanctions]] on any editor working on pages broadly related to [[Shakespeare authorship question]] if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], any expected [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standards of behavior]], or any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question#Final decision]]. <!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 17:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:35, 22 March 2011
Welcome
|
A topic of interest to you is covered by Arbcom sanctions
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Shakespeare authorship question if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question#Final decision. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC)