User talk:Tonywalton/Mar-Apr-2006: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Cheers for correcting the title of my page - wasn't sure how to capitalise the surname. Ah well, I'll learn! [[User:Paddyk|Paddyk]] 15:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC) |
Cheers for correcting the title of my page - wasn't sure how to capitalise the surname. Ah well, I'll learn! [[User:Paddyk|Paddyk]] 15:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
==6700 BC== |
|||
Tony, that entire page is a joke - there is no more evidence for the Xia dynasty of China, yet if that can be considered unification, then speculative dates proposed by Indian nationalist historians can also be - 6700 should be left just as it is. |
Revision as of 17:13, 8 March 2006
German immigration to Puerto Rico
Thank you buddy! What do you think of the article so far? Tony the Marine 15:50, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
STOP IT
STOP SCREWING UP MY ARTCLES IT DOES HAVE SIGNIFIGANCE --Craffe 14:44, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
SEMPER FIDELIS! WILL DO.
The PCD talk page
I did not blank that page to cover up my defacing, that i openly admit. i did it to cover up my admission that "the school's administration hates freedom". my school is run by a bunch of beauracratic nut jobs, in case you haven't noticed by them wanting the page removed.--Samael775 02:21, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for my first ever message on my usertalk page! DaMaul 15:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! Yankees76 16:53, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Cheers
Cheers for correcting the title of my page - wasn't sure how to capitalise the surname. Ah well, I'll learn! Paddyk 15:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
6700 BC
Tony, that entire page is a joke - there is no more evidence for the Xia dynasty of China, yet if that can be considered unification, then speculative dates proposed by Indian nationalist historians can also be - 6700 should be left just as it is.