User talk:Director: Difference between revisions
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
On the [[Talk:Draža Mihailović|Draža Mihailović]] talk page, you made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dra%C5%BEa_Mihailovi%C4%87&diff=433409767&oldid=433398331 this post]. Calling another user a "POV-pusher of the most obvious sort..." is not in keeping with [[WP:NPA]]. Would you be able to remove or modify the statement now, please? [[User:Sunray|Sunray]] ([[User talk:Sunray|talk]]) 20:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC) |
On the [[Talk:Draža Mihailović|Draža Mihailović]] talk page, you made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dra%C5%BEa_Mihailovi%C4%87&diff=433409767&oldid=433398331 this post]. Calling another user a "POV-pusher of the most obvious sort..." is not in keeping with [[WP:NPA]]. Would you be able to remove or modify the statement now, please? [[User:Sunray|Sunray]] ([[User talk:Sunray|talk]]) 20:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Why certainly, Sunray. --<font face="Eras Bold ITC">[[User:DIREKTOR|<font color="DimGray">DIREKTOR</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DIREKTOR|<font color="Gray">TALK</font>]])</sup></font> 20:11, 9 June 2011 (UTC) |
:Why certainly, Sunray. --<font face="Eras Bold ITC">[[User:DIREKTOR|<font color="DimGray">DIREKTOR</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DIREKTOR|<font color="Gray">TALK</font>]])</sup></font> 20:11, 9 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
::Thank you. [[User:Sunray|Sunray]] ([[User talk:Sunray|talk]]) 21:29, 9 June 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:29, 9 June 2011
Sign (~~~~) before you save.
Home Talk Contributions Archives Make yourself at home.... | ||||
Socialist Republic of CroatiaHello, Director. You have new messages at Talk:Socialist Republic of Croatia#Predecessors/Successors.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You wonOk you won: never more contribute by me in dalmatian articles ok? I'm not a sock, so thanks me for house of cerva and stop bother me or accusing me i'm not interested any more in YOUR influenced pages.
Another edit war.Hello, Director. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the Hello, Director. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the TalkbackHello, Director. You have new messages at Paul Siebert's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. TalkbackHello, Director. You have new messages at PRODUCER's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. TalkbackHello, Director. You have new messages at Kubura's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. You forgot one thingSecularism is NOT a bad thing, even Catholics should objectively accept this (but then they should also "objectively" accept that there is no more evidence that God exists than there is for Jupiter, or Set, or this Amazing Invisible Pink Elephant standing right behind me :). Tito could've massacred every single christian in Yugoslavia, removing religious indoctri...er education from state-run schools would still be a good thing. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 23:57, 20 August 2009 (UTC) zaboravio si spomenuti kada si govorio o 'religious indoctrination', da se u jugi predavao (čitaj indoktrinirao) sat marksizma pogledaj se u ogledalo kada tako voliš srati po svojim katoličkim korijenima kao da si još u pubertetu... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.207.80.103 (talk) 19:22, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Useless debates all overDirektor, you refused to engage in a overviewed debate over Chetniks and Mihailovic issues at the Mediation where this two precise subjects are mediated. I am a mediation participant, and I wan´t engage in parallel discussions all over wp over this with non mediation participants. My previous experience tells me that it is uselles to debate issues where people clearly have objectives and goals and where they don´t have a neutral approach. I will only accept discussing this issues (for 50th time) if there is going to be an overview of the debate and if participants agree to accept the outcome (as in mediation). Otherwise, I wan´t fall into the tramp again of discussing with people that don´t change their rethoric whatever presented to them. The articles will be replaced soon, and will follow the outcome of the mediation, so you can choose what you prefer to do in the meantime. PS: The behavior of yours is being disruptive again. Beside all agressiveness against me, you flood all my discussions making them impossible for any third party to follow or to be included. You are doing this purpously so your version stays protected. I can conclude that I am being ganged-up, and that all my attempts of discussion are being blocked by your flooding of same already discussed texts. You failed to archive your point at the mediation, so now you´re trying to archive it by force in talk pages. However, it is interesting to see how you slightly change your rethoric by acknolledging certain facts now, however, you don´t change any concrete editing style, despite having already been prooved as wrong and biased at mediation itself. FkpCascais (talk) 20:28, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
Notification of WP:AN/EW reportThis is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the Edit warring policy at the Administrators' noticeboard. More of sameDespite the fact that you often failed to notify me in the distant and recent past (when I find myself with time, I´ll actually count the times you did that, just for evidence), I allways notified you of every single complain I did about you, and they were many. Here → [1]. FkpCascais (talk) 02:38, 7 June 2011 (UTC) I received your message and have made a request to the user. Could you point me towards the place where this source was previously discussed? Thanks, JodyB talk 13:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
I think that is probably it. My suggestion is to bring to the talk page again in this context. If it is included it must not be given undue weight in the article. My preference would be to exclude it altogether because his views are so outside the mainstream. Nevertheless some may insist. It should certainly be very minor. JodyB talk 17:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Sticking to content, not the contributorOn the Draža Mihailović talk page, you made this post. Calling another user a "POV-pusher of the most obvious sort..." is not in keeping with WP:NPA. Would you be able to remove or modify the statement now, please? Sunray (talk) 20:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC) |