Jump to content

User talk:Donald Albury: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Donald Albury/Archive 9.
Napule (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
{{WikimediaAllLicensing}}
{{WikimediaAllLicensing}}
<!-- ;<font color='red' font=large>My participation in Wikipedia is erratic. There are no guarantees how soon, if ever, I will respond to any message left on this page. I'm tired of conditions here so I have gone on an indefinite break. If conditions improve, I might come back, but I don't think that will happen any time soon. --></font>
<!-- ;<font color='red' font=large>My participation in Wikipedia is erratic. There are no guarantees how soon, if ever, I will respond to any message left on this page. I'm tired of conditions here so I have gone on an indefinite break. If conditions improve, I might come back, but I don't think that will happen any time soon. --></font>


== About Deletion of [[Front for the Liberation of the Napolitania]] ==
Why do you deleted this article, actually I was not ready with that, could you set a Temp tag instead next time and write something in talk before you delete??!


== Threat ==
== Threat ==

Revision as of 16:26, 18 June 2011

This is a Wikipedia user discussion page.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Donald_Albury.

Wikimedia Foundation
Wikimedia Foundation
To leave a message on this page, click here.
If you email me, be aware that even if I am actively editing, I cannot always access my email and it may be a day or two before you receive a reply.

*Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
*Use headlines when starting new talk topics.
*Comment about the content of a specific article on the Talk: page of that article, and not here.
*Do not make personal attacks or use the page for harassment.
*Sign your post using four tildes ( ~~~~ )

Comments which fail to follow the rules above may be immediately deleted.

-->Archive 9 - Archive 8 - Archive 7 - Archive 6 - Archive 5 - Archive 4 - Archive 3 - Archive 2 - Archive 1 Archives


Licensing rights granted to Wikimedia Foundation
I grant non-exclusive permission for the Wikimedia Foundation Inc. to relicense my text and media contributions, including any images, audio clips, or video clips, under any copyleft license that it chooses, provided it maintains the free and open spirit of the GFDL. This permission acknowledges that future licensing needs of the Wikimedia projects may need adapting in unforeseen fashions to facilitate other uses, formats, and locations. It is given for as long as this banner remains.


Why do you deleted this article, actually I was not ready with that, could you set a Temp tag instead next time and write something in talk before you delete??!

Threat

This talk of an edit war is new to me, rather than giving threats of a blocking here and now, why not actually attempt to assist me? I was not aware of a 'slow' deletion process, and I find it hard to believe there isn't a form of appeal available by reinstating it. Rather than simply going 'we'll block you if you do it', actually offer an explanation of the actual due process? It's starting to become clear why this site constantly gets targeted by vandals, the way mods behave on here only serves to spur them on. Aidyzzle (talk) 23:10, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask why you removed content

You removed two links claiming they were not relevant to the article. We interviewed the link content owner before posting our contribution. Their article more accurately describes Radio Jingles.

Similarly you removed two links yet you left a 401 missing and broken as one that is relevant?

Can you help me by understanding why those links remaining are relevant and ours were not? JasonBournes1 (talk) 15:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Link removal

You asked me to read the content I did that. My question was. What is in breach of the rules, what is wrong with those two links what constitutes a breach exactly, upon what exact grounds are you removing them and is this factual or speculative on your part? Secondly you did not ask why you removed two links but left a 401 dead link on the page, is a dead link more relevant than the links we chose? What is your authority personally in the field of radio, radio jingles or this context please?

All of these will help me understand why the content I added was saved but external links were removed, makes no sense to me at this stage.

Forgive me but isn't there a discussion about edits or is it a case of we just remove things we don't personally agree with on Wikipedia?

JasonBournes1 (talk) 21:55, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link recommendations

My apologies, I was not aware that it was up to two years (I thought it was a good number of months) nor was I aware of the Wayback Machine. Thanks for telling me about them. Dalyup! (talk) 14:50, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Parrott

see his response to you. ani. time but i am ina field so a few hours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talkcontribs) 13:09, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]