Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Keanubreeze: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:57, 3 August 2011

Keanubreeze

Keanubreeze (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Keanubreeze/Archive.

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

03 August 2011

Suspected sockpuppets

Theonlinewriting1 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This new account appears to be an additional puppet of Keanubreeze based upon the following: 1) A strong interest in the Benjamin Potter article, to the point of making a very similar argument on the Afd to those made by the sock: [1]. 2) I note that part of that argument is trying to establish the legitimacy of Mr. Potter's university, and that this editor made several edits such as [2] to other articles to enhance the stature of that line of argument. 3) The sock also showed an interest in pernicious anemia with this edit [3] and this account has shown the same interest here [4]. 4) It was admitted previously by the sock here [5] that, "Mr. Potter is a professional client of our business" yet with the added statement in the same diff of, "could you please refrain from these ridiculous accusations that I am somehow related or attributed to the career of Mr. Potter." I am confused by this statement, as having a person as a client strongly implies a relation to the person and is a clear conflict of interest. So to summarize, this account has demonstrated strong overlap with the sock on the sock's primary topic of interest, which is a conflict of interest, has participated in an AfD on the same topic making a very similar argument, and has also done minor editing on a disease which the sock also has expressed a minor editing interest in. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Different computers and IPs, same ISP and city. Either the person from before switched things up or it's an acquaintance. TNXMan 15:52, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note I think it's an acquaintance: aside from the Benjamin Potter article, they have no other articles in common. I'm closing this without any further action for now. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 23:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 {{SPIpriorcases}}
-{{SPI case status|checked}}
+{{SPI case status|close}}
 =====<big>03 August 2011</big>=====
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
 Different computers and IPs, same ISP and city. Either the person from before switched things up or it's an acquaintance. <font color="darkorange">[[User:Tnxman307|TN]]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>[[User talk:Tnxman307|X]]</big></font></b><font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/Tnxman307|Man]]</font> 15:52, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
+*{{adminnote}} I think it's an acquaintance: aside from the Benjamin Potter article, they have [http://toolserver.org/~mzmcbride/cgi-bin/wikistalk.py?namespace=0&all=on&user1=Keanubreeze&user2=Theonlinewriting1&user3=&user4=&user5=&user6=&user7=&user8=&user9=&user10= no other articles] in common. I'm closing this without any further action for now. — [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:HelloAnnyong|(say whaaat?!)]]</sup> 23:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 ----
 <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->