Grounds for divorce: Difference between revisions
Added {{confusing}} and {{one source}} tags to article (TW) |
m moved Grounds for divorce in other countries to Grounds for divorce: Other than what? Wikipedia has readers and editors all over the globe. |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 03:11, 21 October 2011
![]() | This article may be confusing or unclear to readers. (October 2011) |
This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. (October 2011) |
It is imperative to state a variety of reasons for the breakdown of marriage globally and primitive communities to some extent.[1]For example, Sudan is a remote place where adultry is a common practice.[1] However, In Sudan adultry is considered a ground for divorce.[1]
In more established countries one of the frequent issues of family law is the merits and demerits of fault-based and non-fault-based grounds for divorce. [2]A majority of countries and states have been accepting no-fault grounds for divorce including numerous of grounds beyond the breakdown of the marriage. [2]Several legal systems do not want to eliminate fault completely and reserve it in limited situations.[2]
In other countries like Switzerland they terminated fault as one of the grounds for divorce and recommened divorce by mutual consent.[3] In Germany a 1 or 3 year sepration plus a mutual agreement will compose as a ground for divorce.[3]
In China there ancient law consisted of three types of divorce that were recognized: 1) Mutual consent; 2) repudiation "seven grounds for men and three grounds for women"; 3)"intolerable acts against principles of conjugality." [4] In 1981 Chinas marriage law was based on the assumtion that marriage is established of of love, understanding, and mutual respect, which will conclude of loyalty and dedication to the nation.[4]
References
- ^ a b c Peter De Cruz (2010). Family law, sex and society: a comparative study of family law. Taylor & Francis. pp. 22–. ISBN 978-1-85941-638-9. Retrieved 11 October 2011.
- ^ a b c Peter De Cruz (2010). Family law, sex and society: a comparative study of family law. Taylor & Francis. pp. 23–. ISBN 978-1-85941-638-9. Retrieved 12 October 2011.
- ^ a b Peter De Cruz (2010). Family law, sex and society: a comparative study of family law. Taylor & Francis. pp. 24–. ISBN 978-1-85941-638-9. Retrieved 13 October 2011.
- ^ a b Bron B. Ingoldsby; Suzanna D. Smith (2006). Families in global and multicultural perspective. SAGE. pp. 180–. ISBN 978-0-7619-2819-5. Retrieved 13 October 2011.
This article has not been added to any content categories. Please help out by adding categories to it so that it can be listed with similar articles. (October 2011) |