User talk:LadyofShalott

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Centralized discussion

Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.
The Signpost
20 May 2015

Disambiguation link notification for May 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dittewal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujrat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC)


Hello, I would like to request that the deleted article for Jessica Humble be moved to my userspace so I can review. Thank you, Hmlarson (talk) 17:36, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Hmlarson, see User:Hmlarson/Jessica Humble. LadyofShalott 16:22, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
@LadyofShalott: Thank you - much appreciated. Hmlarson (talk) 16:43, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Request for deleted content[edit]

Please could you post the old source information (or what there was of it) of File:Thucydides_Manuscript_Tenth_Century.jpg to my talk page? It's needed to support commons:File:Kappa-variant.png's source info. Thanks, User:GKFXtalk 10:42, 20 May 2015 (UTC).

Is what you are looking for this website GKFX? That seems to be all there was for source information. --kelapstick(bainuu) 16:41, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks very much, that was what I was looking for. User:GKFXtalk 08:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for handling it, K! LadyofShalott 16:31, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox basketball biography[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox basketball biography. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on American Gods[edit]

I see you removed the section on Plot Holes. Just wondering if it's common practice in Wikipedia book articles to exclude that sort of content? If so, my apologies for the original edit and thank you for removing it. —  Apgold (talkcontribs) 18:54, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Apgold, well, I can't say I've seen such a section before, but that doesn't mean there shouldn't be one. We commonly let plot sections go unreferenced, with the tacit understanding that the work is itself the reference. You could make the case that your section was merely an extension of that. I considered that, but deleted on the grounds that I thought you had strayed into WP:original research territory - that it was too much your original thought. A couple suggestions - seek other opinions of WP editors (I'm not certain enough of my position, and others may well have no problem with the section you added) and/or strengthen your section by citing secondary sources. So and so commented on this plot hole. Blah blah blah Then it would be much harder for anyone to dispute the section. LadyofShalott 02:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)