Jump to content

User talk:Δ: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 19: Line 19:
== Are you aware of this? ==
== Are you aware of this? ==
Someone is making some fairly egregious claims about you [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fluttershy#I_was_protecting_Betacommand.]. Frankly, I think the whole thing is pure trolling but your input at the AN/I discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Fluttershy_appeal] would probably be helpful. [[User:Night Ranger|Night Ranger]] ([[User talk:Night Ranger|talk]]) 02:56, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Someone is making some fairly egregious claims about you [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fluttershy#I_was_protecting_Betacommand.]. Frankly, I think the whole thing is pure trolling but your input at the AN/I discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Fluttershy_appeal] would probably be helpful. [[User:Night Ranger|Night Ranger]] ([[User talk:Night Ranger|talk]]) 02:56, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
:Actually I did know that fluttershy was a sock, in late November PMBL approached me on IRC, revealed themselves and stated that they where working with a group of editors (at least one of them being up for election for arbcom). I did some preliminary research and notified [[User:Σ]] on 28 November 2011. Attempting to get as much info as I could I did not immediately rush to arbcom, I was trying to get all involved users. On 09 December 2011, I notified Σ again, provided what logs I had along with all other evidence that I had gathered, and suggested that he pass it to checkusers and those other parties as deemed necessary. I do not know if the CUs where notified but I know arbcom was. Because I had no public information I could not publicly out the sock, however I did back channel and raise the red flag in order to nail the sock. Since PBML decided to attempt to drag my name through the mud, I decided to publicly defend myself. If you have any more questions let me know. [[User talk:Δ|ΔT <sub><sup><span style="color:darkred;">The only constant</span></sup></sub>]] 04:21, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:21, 5 February 2012

Once more I'm off to do some work

archives:  1   2  3   4   5
               6   7  8   9  10
              11 12 13 14 15
              16 17 18 19

Could you shed some light on a past interaction

This specifically (direct link to diff-in-diff). I understand if you choose to say nothing given your current relationship with the ArbCom. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 01:31, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In simple terms Rlevse and myself did not get along too well. ΔT The only constant 03:54, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Δ/sandbox moved to Template:SPICaseStatusSummary

The bot doesn't update on the moved name. --Il223334234 (talk) 11:02, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No kidding.
It's rude to edit pages in the user space of other editors, doubly so to move them. Please leave them alone in the future, in particular if you don't know how bots work, and if you are uninformed about the requirements for bot tasks on Wikipedia. Amalthea 12:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware of this?

Someone is making some fairly egregious claims about you [1]. Frankly, I think the whole thing is pure trolling but your input at the AN/I discussion [2] would probably be helpful. Night Ranger (talk) 02:56, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I did know that fluttershy was a sock, in late November PMBL approached me on IRC, revealed themselves and stated that they where working with a group of editors (at least one of them being up for election for arbcom). I did some preliminary research and notified User:Σ on 28 November 2011. Attempting to get as much info as I could I did not immediately rush to arbcom, I was trying to get all involved users. On 09 December 2011, I notified Σ again, provided what logs I had along with all other evidence that I had gathered, and suggested that he pass it to checkusers and those other parties as deemed necessary. I do not know if the CUs where notified but I know arbcom was. Because I had no public information I could not publicly out the sock, however I did back channel and raise the red flag in order to nail the sock. Since PBML decided to attempt to drag my name through the mud, I decided to publicly defend myself. If you have any more questions let me know. ΔT The only constant 04:21, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]