User talk:Chip123456: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:52, 23 April 2012

This is Chip123456's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Chip123456 uses the Wikibreak Switch template, and plans to update this notice if a wikibreak is taken.

April 2012

Hi Chip, I've added more references to Herne Hill railway station following your review. Tommy20000 (talk) 18:17, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a reference to the transport links section.Tommy20000 (talk) 20:05, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing and approving the article, much appreciated. Now to get FA status before the 150th anniversary in August! Tommy20000 (talk) 10:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure, if you carry on the way you are with improving the article, I can see the FA dream becoming a reality. --Chip123456 (talk) 10:35, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sarnia Good Article Nomination

Hi, Chip123456. For the Sarnia article, I think I have all paragraphs with citations, both external and through internal linking. Let me know if I missed any.TheKurgan (talk) 19:53, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right, let me have a look now as yesterday I saw some paragraphs without any references. --Chip123456 (talk) 09:11, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you added more references yesterday. I and another editor have put some more improvements on the talk page. --Chip123456 (talk) 09:20, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How is it looking?TheKurgan (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good, I see you have cut out the museum section and placed it in the attractions section which I think is sensible. An expansion on the health car would be good, although take a break!!! It's OK to have a break every now and then, you still have around 6 days to make it the best it can be!--Chip123456 (talk) 21:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Once I get this to GA standard, next step is FA!TheKurgan (talk) 01:14, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you will, I have left some more improvements on healthcare. --Chip123456 (talk) 10:47, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have made changes to the changes, Chip. Sorry if I misunderstood your recommendations. I hope you like the new rework! TheKurgan (talk) 14:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Life peer articles

Hi. Just to let you know, it's Wikipedia convention to put "The Lord X" (either "Lady" or "Baroness" for female life peers) in the infoboxs relating to life peers, such as Alan Sugar, as they are officially styled as such. See WP:NCPEER and MOS:HONORIFIC. Thanks, --Tærkast (Discuss) 18:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for telling me. Yep, I know they are styled like that but I thought that we should put the official title!! Thanks --Chip123456 (talk) 18:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Italics for terminus

Hi, re this edit - in a routebox, the best way of italicising Terminus is to omit the parameter. Most of the {{rail line}} group will show Terminus by default if one or more of the |previous=/|next= parameters are blank or absent. BTW it's only vandalism if it's malicious damage - a failed attempt to "improve" the page falls under good-faith. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:17, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They were good faith edits, but I did tell the user that they shouldn't do that and they continued, hence me taking the step between GF edits and vandalism. --Chip123456 (talk) 15:39, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Section names on talk pages

Hi, I've renamed this thread because it duplicated another (one which was created after yours: User talk:Redrose64#April 2012), so section links were either going to the wrong place, or failing completely. Month/year section names are normally only used for templated messages such ase warnings (see WP:UW) - other messages get a descriptive header (see WP:TALKNEW). --Redrose64 (talk) 11:04, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that fine thanks for informing me. --Chip123456 (talk) 15:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CVU Academy

Hello, Chip123456! The instructors at the Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy have seen your hard work reverting Vandalism when you see it, and we thank you. But do you want to go to the next level? Would you like to know how reverts, warnings, reports, blocks, and bans all come together to keep the Encyclopedia free from disruption? Then consider Enrolling today! Achowat (talk) 14:12, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, yes, sounds good! Anything to reduce vandalism I'm there to help!--Chip123456 (talk) 15:52, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 53: / Line 53: @@
 | [[File:CVU Academy.svg|center|100px]]
 | Hello, '''{{PAGENAME}}'''! The instructors at the [[WP:CVUA|Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy]] have seen your hard work reverting Vandalism when you see it, and we thank you. But do you want to go to the next level? Would you like to know how reverts, warnings, reports, blocks, and bans all come together to keep the Encyclopedia free from disruption? Then consider [[Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy/Enroll|Enrolling]] today! [[User:Achowat|Achowat]] ([[User talk:Achowat|talk]]) 14:12, 23 April 2012 (UTC) <!-- Substituted from Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy/Invite-instructor -->
+Ok, yes, sounds good! Anything to reduce vandalism I'm there to help!--[[User:Chip123456|Chip123456]] ([[User talk:Chip123456#top|talk]]) 15:52, 23 April 2012 (UTC)