Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ryanjay1996: Difference between revisions
checked |
Marking case as closed |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|close}} |
||
=====<big>30 April 2012</big>===== |
=====<big>30 April 2012</big>===== |
Revision as of 14:53, 30 April 2012
Ryanjay1996
- Ryanjay1996 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
30 April 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Joker j1993 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Rapperryan87 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Clerk note: Malformed report combined with newly-opened case. —DoRD (talk) 13:17, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
(Note: I've posted this already on the archive posts but I did not get any replies so I posted them here)
He has created another new account. A spotted the 1st account a few weeks ago and reverted its edits. Afterwards it displayed no more activity until now. Its once again visiting every single band/group articles and invading the member's section by adding its own opinion of the bands and group positions (see WP:Fancruft). Its using a different style of editing now and just completely deleting the previous format for most articles such as the member's table. Instead its listing their names and positions in bullet points.
I also discovered a 2nd account today. Its trying to add a new message to prevent it from detected and suspected of IP sock editing.
Here's an example:
Bleubeatle (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
— User:Bleubeatle 00:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Same MO as master. Quacking username. WP:DUCK Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 12:02, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Administrator note An unambiguous sockpuppet, and I have indef-blocked it. However, as checkuser for sleepers could be helpful, in view of this editor's persistence in using multiple sockpuppets. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Clerk endorsed - Socks are already blocked, but as it has been some seven weeks since the last time, I'm endorsing for a sleeper check. —DoRD (talk) 12:58, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- No other accounts seen. TNXMan 14:23, 30 April 2012 (UTC)