User talk:SilverSide1895

Welcome!

Hello, SilverSide1895, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - Eagle^amn 19:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks lol - probably you should use {{subst:Welcome}} instead of simply {{Welcome}} - it seems less cookie-cutter when the new user edits to reply, like I did... anyway, I am not new anyway - just haven't been around Wikipedia in a while and lost my password. Been around various other wikis however... thanks anyway! -- _ℑilver§^ℑide 20:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

re: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not

Good morning. You recently made a change to this page with the comment "Two minor errors in as many minutes; to majorly important pages. I'm starting to get worried..." I'm not sure what minor errors you were talking about because the only change you made to the page was to capitalize "article" in the link to Wikipedia:Article size. While Wikipedia links are case-sensitive, that is not true for the first letter. The link worked both before and after your edit. In cases like this, it's really just a style choice whether the editors choose to capitalize or not. But if you were referring to something else, please let the rest of us know so we can help with whatever clean-up problem you've found. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 13:38, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Not sure if your still watching this page, but I didn't mean anything major. I know all about wikis, thanks (-: Was just talking about

1. The un-capitalized link among all the others on the page - for some reason, you don't obscure namespaces in links on those pages, which I find strange; but in any case, every other link was in the form [[Namespace:Capitalized uncapitalized]], and that link alone was different. Thought it strange that that had gone un-noticed, as that was the first thing I saw coming to that page.
2. The lack of definition[1] on Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines - again, a minor edit; but really quite glaring, considering the IMPORTANCE of the page in question.

The fact that I visited exactly two high-high-profile pages and got exactly two errors sort of disturbed me, to say the least. Oh well, one more thing to add to the list of things that offend me about wikipedia. Thanks for your time, Rossami, in asking about my edit (-: _ℑilver§^ℑide 00:14, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Diablo III

I would be willing to help craft an article on the upcoming game, if it is not P2P. If I am required to pay monthly, I am most likely going to write Blizzard off as a once-great gaming company, gone to seed. -Chewbacca 02:48, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

• Yeah, I'll definitely be playing Diablo III and contributing to it on here if/when it comes out... if it's not P2P. I'm already paying to play World of Warcraft, I don't particularly want to pay another fee for DIII, plus it just wouldn't be in the tradition of the previous Diablos. -- MacAddct1984  03:34, 19 April 2006 (UTC)