User talk:Mtking: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 6 discussions to User talk:Mtking/Archives/2012/May. (BOT) |
Gamezero05 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
I undid your lowering of the archive time. There's several complaint threads that are scheduled for Early Archiving. As such I'd like to hold off on changing the archive time until the complaint threads are dealt with by archiving first. Thanks [[User:Hasteur|Hasteur]] ([[User talk:Hasteur|talk]]) 12:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC) |
I undid your lowering of the archive time. There's several complaint threads that are scheduled for Early Archiving. As such I'd like to hold off on changing the archive time until the complaint threads are dealt with by archiving first. Thanks [[User:Hasteur|Hasteur]] ([[User talk:Hasteur|talk]]) 12:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
: No problem [[User:Mtking|<span style="color:Green;text-shadow:lightgreen 0.110em 0.110em 0.110em;">Mt</span>]][[User talk:Mtking|<span style="color:gold;">king</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Mtking|<font color="gold"> (edits) </font>]]</sup> 12:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC) |
: No problem [[User:Mtking|<span style="color:Green;text-shadow:lightgreen 0.110em 0.110em 0.110em;">Mt</span>]][[User talk:Mtking|<span style="color:gold;">king</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Mtking|<font color="gold"> (edits) </font>]]</sup> 12:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Interesting == |
|||
So when I nominate something for deletion that you don't want deleted, you go an contact an inclusionist to look into it. You would never do that for an MMA article. This shows that you are playing both sides of the field and you have a clear vendetta with MMA on Wikipedia. [[User:Gamezero05|<span style="color:White;text-shadow:blue 0.110em 0.110em 0.110em;">Gamezero</span>]][[User talk:Gamezero05|<span style="color:White;text-shadow:darkorange 0.110em 0.110em 0.110em;">05</span>]] 00:04, 2 June 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:04, 2 June 2012
 | Mtking is busy with work until 18 May 2011 due to a business trip and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Question
Why are secondary sources needed for full fight results? What would you trust more with full results of a particular event... a company who's work revolves around that said event, or some other source reporting from the outside looking in? Gamezero05 (talk) 05:29, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Given that a question has been raised on the Talk page about the results then we need to make sure they are correct. Mtking (edits) 05:31, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- So is UFC.com not a good source for fight results? Gamezero05 (talk) 05:40, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- It was me who raised the question for a spesific bout. I believe it was a tapout, meaning "submission (strike and elbows)" because referee stepped in when the fighter was tapping. I raised the question based on those ground. When I searched the original source, it does infact state TKO. Other sources state the same thing, so I went over to the talk page and retracted my statement.
- When for sourcing goes, you do not need other independent sources for bout results. Mazter00 (talk) 05:51, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- (Talk Stalk Alert!!) Without knowing exactly the situation (I'm assuming it's UFC 146 which I'm planning on watching on Monday so I'm not going to spoil it for myself), Sherdog.com is almost always a good secondary source for MMA fight results. They have been incredibly good at providing accurate results, usually from the sanctioning body. Of course, I could be totally out of line, in which case, ignore this comment. ;) --TreyGeek (talk) 05:58, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- So is UFC.com not a good source for fight results? Gamezero05 (talk) 05:40, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
This Article?
How do you feel about this article? 2012 in WWE events They want it to be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul "The Wall" (talk • contribs) 11:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
2012 in UFC Talk page
I undid your lowering of the archive time. There's several complaint threads that are scheduled for Early Archiving. As such I'd like to hold off on changing the archive time until the complaint threads are dealt with by archiving first. Thanks Hasteur (talk) 12:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- No problem Mtking (edits) 12:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Interesting
So when I nominate something for deletion that you don't want deleted, you go an contact an inclusionist to look into it. You would never do that for an MMA article. This shows that you are playing both sides of the field and you have a clear vendetta with MMA on Wikipedia. Gamezero05 00:04, 2 June 2012 (UTC)