Jump to content

User talk:Kurdo777: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bad faith accusation: I have removed the thread
Hooman Majd: new section
Line 81: Line 81:
I also suggest you retract baseless accusation. I watch Binksternet's user talkpage (as well as many other editors). You edited the talkpage. I followed the links out of curiosity. There is nothing particularly controversial about that. [[User:IRWolfie-|IRWolfie-]] ([[User talk:IRWolfie-|talk]]) 18:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
I also suggest you retract baseless accusation. I watch Binksternet's user talkpage (as well as many other editors). You edited the talkpage. I followed the links out of curiosity. There is nothing particularly controversial about that. [[User:IRWolfie-|IRWolfie-]] ([[User talk:IRWolfie-|talk]]) 18:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
:You did not retract your claims about Binksternet asking me to perform the revert. So I have removed the thread. [[User:IRWolfie-|IRWolfie-]] ([[User talk:IRWolfie-|talk]]) 19:12, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
:You did not retract your claims about Binksternet asking me to perform the revert. So I have removed the thread. [[User:IRWolfie-|IRWolfie-]] ([[User talk:IRWolfie-|talk]]) 19:12, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

== [[Hooman Majd]] ==

Kurdo, I don't understand why you are reverting. For example, in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hooman_Majd&diff=504193414&oldid=504190849 this example] it is a quote from a reliable source so there is no reason to remove it, [[WP:BLP]] does not apply to notable (which I believe this is) things which are reliably sourced (which this is). It may be that I'm missing something so would you mind enlightening me? Thanks, '''[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]''' ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]]) <small>[[Template:talkback|talkback]] (etc) template appreciated.</small> 05:55, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:55, 26 July 2012

* If you have any content related questions or concerns, please use the relevant article's talk page

Hi!

Since you have been doing a lot of edits on the Iranian 1953 page, I thought perhaps you would be interested in this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat#Biased_article Have a nice day --Tondar1 (talk) 16:39, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kurdo777. You have new messages at Ebrahimi-amir's talk page.
Message added 21:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite


Hello Kurdo777. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.


You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 00:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

translation

ببخشید من یه زحمت کوچکی برای شما داشتم ، می خواستم این جمله را برایم به انگلیسی ترجمه کنید :

این کشور که تا سال ۱۹۱۸ میلادی (۱۲۹۷ش) هرگز آذربایجان نامیده نمی‌شد زمانی نام کهن آن آلبانیا بود. در روستای «بویوک دَکَن» واقع در بخش نوخای قفقاز نوشته‌ای به خط و زبان یونانی باستان به دست آمده که تاریخ آن را سده ۲ میلادی دانسته‌اند و در آن از «آلبانیا» یاد شده‌است. در نوشته‌های مورخان باستان از جمله پلیبیوس و استرابون نیز این با نام «آلبانیا» آمده‌است. به نظر بعضی محققان، آلبانیا در منابع پارتی زبان به صورت «اردان» آمده‌است. در منابع عهد اسلامی این نام اران و «الران» نوشته‌اند. این نام به احتمال قوی با نام پارتی «اردان» مرتبط است. گاه نیز از این سرزمین با دو نام اران و شروان یاد کرده‌اند. پس از لشکرکشی‌های تیمور و داستان ترکمان‌های آق قویونلو و قره قوینلو نام اران به تدریج از کتاب‌ها برداشته شد

با تشکر --Espiral (talk) 16:59, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion for sockpuppetry

You recently reverted changes to several articles I follow for alleged sockpuppetry. Among the articles most affected was Sanctions against Iran. I'm not sure who the original banned editor was or what the offense was, or who the sockpuppets are, but there seems to have been a lot of legitimate and useful content (and perhaps some questionable content or spin) included. In short, the recourse seems a bit extreme. I was wondering if you could provide any more explanation. NPguy (talk) 02:38, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sirs ,

I have opened this new Email account after i just realized that my account in wikipedia has been blocked.

i am "puppettheater" that has been blocked from editing. i am new in wikiedia just started to edit in march 2012 . and never wrote entries of my own due to the fact that i don't feel experience anugh to do so


i have read the reasons why u have blocked me and i don't really understand . i only used only 1 account

"puppettheater" and not more. i only now understand that sockpuppet means what it does so my

choose of name was very unfortunate... i don't know who is amir husain is or the others


its true that i write about Iran and Brazil issue that i feel strongly about but i have always tried to use referents

as wiki demands. as a learner i did made some editting mistakes but learned from them on the way.



i would ask you to please re block my account and consider putting back my past edits that have been taken out



thank you

c.alves — Preceding unsigned comment added by Puppettheater1 (talkcontribs) 08:29, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

You made a contentious change here Mohammad_Mosaddegh, it was reverted citing that it is a minority slant and disputed from the sources. I don't know how true or not that is, but I'm willingly to hear both arguments on the talk page. so discuss it on the talk page and get consensus. Knowingly trying to outdo an editor by continually reverting him because you know he is on 1RR is itself edit warring. Do not do it. IRWolfie- (talk) 13:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bad faith accusation

Kurdo777, your accusation is baseless, the one saying that I asked IRWolfie to back me up at the Mohammad Mosaddegh biography. I demand you retract it. Binksternet (talk) 18:16, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I also suggest you retract baseless accusation. I watch Binksternet's user talkpage (as well as many other editors). You edited the talkpage. I followed the links out of curiosity. There is nothing particularly controversial about that. IRWolfie- (talk) 18:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You did not retract your claims about Binksternet asking me to perform the revert. So I have removed the thread. IRWolfie- (talk) 19:12, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kurdo, I don't understand why you are reverting. For example, in this example it is a quote from a reliable source so there is no reason to remove it, WP:BLP does not apply to notable (which I believe this is) things which are reliably sourced (which this is). It may be that I'm missing something so would you mind enlightening me? Thanks, Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 05:55, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]