User talk:Shii/History5

Click here to add something to my talk page!

Click here to add something to someone else's talk page!

Seldomly Asked Questions

Q. You have removed a boilerplate message from some article, but I think it belongs there. Can I put it back?

A. Yes, no problem.

Q. Can I leave you barnstars?

A. Yes! I love barnstars!

Subpages

Misc. nonsense not linked to on my User page:

• /History 2004
• /History2 Jan-Aug 2005
• /History3 Aug-Dec 2005
• /History4 Jan-Apr 2006
• User:Ashibaka/Portal
• User:Ashibaka/RFB nomination records
• User:Ashibaka/WikiProject Rectangular Corners
• User:Ashibaka/Food for thought
• User:Ashibaka/welcome
• User:Ashibaka/cologneblue.css Make Cologne Blue even sweeter.
• User:Ashibaka/example
• User:Ashibaka/Hoaxes

mumble mumble

Being an AOL member of Wiki stinks, sometimes. TJ aka Teej

Lir

something is wrong with them.Lir 03:47 Oct 20, 2002 (UTC)

You heard it from him first.

post to AN/I

Hi Ashibaka, I'm not familiar with the usage of the template you added to Talk:Share taxi, but it appears to require a notification at WP:AN/I, which I can't seem to find. If you've already done this and I missed it when I searched the page, please ignore this message. Cheers, BanyanTree 20:29, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Like Tony Sidaway, I forgot this. (forgot the template too initially) I'll post it now, thanks for the pointer. Ashibaka tock 02:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Sup. u a Star Wars fan?

If u r, ask me ANY question at all regarding Star Wars. I will answer. Live long and prosper. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philber 22 (talk • contribs)

The Winged Self

Hi dear sysop Ashibaka! I've seen your removal editions regarding the mentioned image, from its templates. As you know, lots of articles in Wikipedia have images, looked as symbols, each one trying to represent a concept given in article. This particular symbol relates itself to esoteric philosophies and the inner planes, as it can be concluded from its description. As a Buddhist you will find the conception of planes of existence as "Deva lokas" (or other that I am not deeply acquainted to). On the other hand, related to each one, you have description of exalted Beings far advanced from our human evolution (which evolves through the cycle of rebirth), as taught, among others, in Buddhism and esoteric philosophies. It is taught also that there are beings from our own evolution Who have gone far beyond the cycle of rebirth into Divine spheres "above". Now, if these beings became liberated from the "chain" that bound us here, it should be logical to deduct that they may have joined the gods Who aid us in our evolutionary steps here. Some even do expect such an advanced being, liberated from our evolution cycle, to rebirth here among us in order to bring a new age of spiritual upliftment... Suppose these Beings have already, in silence, been preparing the way in the world for such an event, as previously spoken, and that they teach us that - above all working with our evolution - there is a far higher Spiritual Being - not from human evolution, but from the evolution of a life wave that to our 'eyes' would be as gods - Who aids and directs mankind's evolution. This exalted Spiritual Being would be the One we call Christ, Whom the "The Winged Self" symbol represents in the central White Rose. Blessed be, --62.169.119.157 16:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

I have absolute respect for your religious beliefs, but the fact of the matter is, The Winged Self is a copyrighted image and therefore cannot be used on templates due to our fair use policy. This goes for any image that falls under fair use. Ashibaka tock 22:10, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

I should bill you for the time

Hi!

re: Poor Summary — Many of us would appreciate a comment like "Applied ACCURACY Template because...". We'd appreciate it even more if you annote the talk:Davy Crockett with a prominent section title and notes as is implied by the template: "See Talk..." For example a heading like the below would be in order:

Applying CLEAN Template 27 Apr 06

Because ...

1. this
2. that
3. and more importantly...

• I hope you've been checking back on any such tagged articles... the rest of us shouldn't have to spend our limited wikiTime trying to trace such unthoughtful behaviour, wouldn't you agree?
• In sum, you owe me for nearly a half-hours effort. My billing rate is fairly high, so I'll give you a pass this time. Do be more considerate going forward. You have a responsibility to the other volunteers here do so, wouldn't you agree?

I'm removing the Template now. If you don't like it, put it back with such documented reasons if you are too lazy or disinterested in cleaning up the article yourself. Best regards, FrankB 18:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

I was just marking some errors that I thought I saw on the talk page. Time spent fact-checking the article is not time wasted. Ashibaka tock 22:07, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Re: Block

Thanks for taking action. But I'm afraid the block would not be able to actually help the situation. Please consider to help bring the disputed matters towards discussion, the parties to talk pages and the dispute towards resolution. I've been requesting user:Alanmak to talk, but all effort was in vain. He simply deleted my requests and other messages from his user talk page with edit summary like " disregard bullshit " or not summary at all. — Instantnood 20:39, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm afraid those were hardly concessions. Please see also my response to his message. Thanks for bringing the matter towards possible resolution. — Instantnood 22:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Re: Appreciation

Not at all. That's what every responsible user is obliged to do whenever she/he notices it. — Instantnood 20:46, 27 April 2006 (UTC)