Talk:German submarine U-573: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:25, 8 October 2012

Ships Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War II Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Merge

Another case of 1 ship, two names, two owners = two articles. Maybe the stub Spanish submarine G-7 should be merged into this one? Sebastian scha. (talk) 09:44, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support, not enough info to justify two articles in this case. Mjroots (talk) 10:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support agree to merger MisterBee1966 (talk) 19:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would be opposed to a merge, as the implication of the suggestion (merge G-7 to here) implies the Spanish career of this vessel (over 20-odd years) is less important than the 15 months she spent in the German Navy. As neither career was particularly significant, having two pages avoids the argument over which takes priority: It also makes the categorization simpler. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:25, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 *'''Support''', not enough info to justify two articles in this case. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 10:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 *'''Support''' agree to merger [[User:MisterBee1966|MisterBee1966]] ([[User talk:MisterBee1966|talk]]) 19:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
+*I would be '''opposed''' to a merge, as the implication of the suggestion (merge G-7 to here) implies the Spanish career of this vessel (over 20-odd years) is less important than the 15 months she spent in the German Navy. As neither career was particularly significant, having two pages avoids the argument over which takes priority: It also makes the categorization simpler. [[User:Xyl 54|Xyl 54]] ([[User talk:Xyl 54|talk]]) 22:25, 8 October 2012 (UTC)