Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tandemlaunch Technologies: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Listing on WP:DELSORT
Celtechm (talk | contribs)
keep
Line 8: Line 8:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Technology|list of Technology-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Technology|list of Technology-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' Refs 1,2,4, and 5 seem valid, though coverage focus is both Canadian and academic. Another possible ref [[http://phys.org/news/2012-07-tandemlaunch-d-technology.html Here]]. As a Quebec company, they may also ref in French, but my skills in French aren't up to the search. [[User:Celtechm|Celtechm]] ([[User talk:Celtechm|talk]]) 21:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:25, 22 October 2012

Tandemlaunch Technologies

Tandemlaunch Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of a series of linked articles on very marginally noted company. Article created by subsequently-banned sock-pupeteer active in creating articles on marginally notable technological companies. DGG ( talk ) 09:17, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Refs 1,2,4, and 5 seem valid, though coverage focus is both Canadian and academic. Another possible ref [Here]. As a Quebec company, they may also ref in French, but my skills in French aren't up to the search. Celtechm (talk) 21:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]