Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tandemlaunch Technologies: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Listing on WP:DELSORT |
keep |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Technology|list of Technology-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Technology|list of Technology-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Keep''' Refs 1,2,4, and 5 seem valid, though coverage focus is both Canadian and academic. Another possible ref [[http://phys.org/news/2012-07-tandemlaunch-d-technology.html Here]]. As a Quebec company, they may also ref in French, but my skills in French aren't up to the search. [[User:Celtechm|Celtechm]] ([[User talk:Celtechm|talk]]) 21:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:25, 22 October 2012
Tandemlaunch Technologies
- Tandemlaunch Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One of a series of linked articles on very marginally noted company. Article created by subsequently-banned sock-pupeteer active in creating articles on marginally notable technological companies. DGG ( talk ) 09:17, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as spam. Most refs are in very obscure web publications. Fails WP:COMPANY. Tijfo098 (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Refs 1,2,4, and 5 seem valid, though coverage focus is both Canadian and academic. Another possible ref [Here]. As a Quebec company, they may also ref in French, but my skills in French aren't up to the search. Celtechm (talk) 21:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)