Jump to content

User talk:Vnkd: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Blanked the page
Line 1: Line 1:
== Aero L-39 Albatros ==

Hi,

You just made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aero_L-39_Albatros&diff=522177238&oldid=522158181 this edit], commenting that "'' This approach is not shared with all the other military fighters. Please clean them all or leave this one.''"

It would help you if you could discuss your edits on [[Talk:Aero L-39 Albatros|the article talk page]], and to stay carefully polite in your edit summaries (not like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aero_L-39_Albatros&diff=521985079&oldid=521898014 this one] you made).

Wikipedia has much [[WP:WIKIQUETTE|etiquette]] on how to behave, and powerful sanctions to ban you from editing if you upset too many people. In my case, you have breached the [[WP:BRD|Be bold, revert, discuss]] cycle. This is why I ask you to discuss.

You have been warring with other editors over these edits, even blanking posts on this page that are trying to help you understand. If you do not stop then I expect somebody will soon cause you worse trouble.

So I would ask you, can you point us at some of these other pages you say contain such details of specific minor engagements? You say you have seen them, but I have not. Where are they?

— Cheers, [[User:Steelpillow|Steelpillow]] ([[User Talk:Steelpillow|Talk]]) 20:05, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:05, 9 November 2012

Aero L-39 Albatros

Hi,

You just made this edit, commenting that " This approach is not shared with all the other military fighters. Please clean them all or leave this one."

It would help you if you could discuss your edits on the article talk page, and to stay carefully polite in your edit summaries (not like this one you made).

Wikipedia has much etiquette on how to behave, and powerful sanctions to ban you from editing if you upset too many people. In my case, you have breached the Be bold, revert, discuss cycle. This is why I ask you to discuss.

You have been warring with other editors over these edits, even blanking posts on this page that are trying to help you understand. If you do not stop then I expect somebody will soon cause you worse trouble.

So I would ask you, can you point us at some of these other pages you say contain such details of specific minor engagements? You say you have seen them, but I have not. Where are they?

— Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 20:05, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]