User talk:Mark Ironie: Difference between revisions
→Theresa Spence's hunger strike: new section |
|||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
Good to see [[Theresa Spence]] is being worked on. I'd seen some of the news on her. |
Good to see [[Theresa Spence]] is being worked on. I'd seen some of the news on her. |
||
At this point, I don't believe her strike meets the [[Talk:Hunger_strike#Inclusion_criteria_for_recent_instances_section|inclusion criteria]] for the article. She's getting a great deal of attention as recent news, but it's too early to see if it will have any long-term notability. Most importantly, there's been no results from the strike beyond the publicity. This is the key criteria that we've been using at [[Hunger strike]] to prevent it from becoming a listing of all hunger strikes, instead of |
At this point, I don't believe her strike meets the [[Talk:Hunger_strike#Inclusion_criteria_for_recent_instances_section|inclusion criteria]] for the article. She's getting a great deal of attention as recent news, but it's too early to see if it will have any long-term notability. Most importantly, there's been no results from the strike beyond the publicity. This is the key criteria that we've been using at [[Hunger strike]] to prevent it from becoming a listing of all hunger strikes, instead of an article about hunger strikes that highlights a few extremely notable ones. |
||
Take a look at the talk page discussions and article history. The criteria is working, but not without occasional confusion. There's support for creating a separate list of notable hunger strikes, but I don't think anyone has tried starting it. It'll likely be a very long list, but |
Take a look at the talk page discussions and article history. The criteria is working, but not without occasional confusion. There's support for creating a separate list of notable hunger strikes, but I don't think anyone has tried starting it. It'll likely be a very long list, but it should be manageable if constrained to strikes already mentioned in other articles. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 18:04, 27 December 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:05, 27 December 2012
User:Pigman/Talktop User:Pigman/HeaderTabs Template:Archive box collapsible
Conflict of Interest Disclosure |
---|
Due to some questions about conflict of interest issues with a document I helped author and publish, it seems appropriate that I disclose my connection and role vis-à-vis The CR FAQ. This information includes both the web document as well as the printed/dead tree version. I am one of the co-owners of the domain paganachd.com. The domain hosts The CR FAQ and related articles. This is not a commercial or even non-profit enterprise. There are no ads on the web site but there is a link to buy the printed version of the CR FAQ. All profits from sales the printed version are donated to An Comunn Gàidhealach Ameireaganach for Gaelic language preservation. The sole purpose of the web domain is to provide access to the collaboratively created document known as The CR FAQ and directly related articles. I believe The CR FAQ is a salient secondary source document. I am also co-editor and co-publisher of the the print version of the document, titled The CR FAQ - An Introduction to Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism. I mistakenly used the web site as a source in the Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism article before being clear on the COI problems of my actions. If you have any questions regarding my relationship to the domain and document, please ask me here. (Note: I'm deliberately not using external links to the site or book to avoid using Wikipedia to drive traffic to them.) |
![]() |
---|
14 August 2024 |
|
Arthur Heygate Mackmurdo article
Hi there, I saw that you were a Professor a College of Arts Communication and Sciences.
I'm a graphic design student from De Montfort University, Leicester, England. I was using the article linked below for a project and have revisited it to find it was removed due to potential copyright issues.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Heygate_Mackmurdo
Is there any chance you could send me a copy of the suspended article?
My email address is: lawrence.stigner@live.co.uk
Any help you can give me would be greatly appreciated.
Your Sincerely,
Lawrence Stigner
SilverStream89 (talk) 01:31, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Anchorsong
Hello,
I see that on 22 April 2008 you deleted the page for the electronic musician Anchorsong
"05:34, 22 April 2008 Pigman (talk | contribs) deleted page Anchorsong (A7 (group): Group/band/club/company/etc; doesn't indicate importance/significance)"
I am writing to inform you that I am re-creating the wikipedia page. I will include verified references (web interviews, youtube videos, album reviews) in order to bolster the artist's credibility.
Many thanks
Anchorsong (talk) 12:10, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0e/Dispute_Resolution_on_the_English_Wikipedia.pdf/page1-220px-Dispute_Resolution_on_the_English_Wikipedia.pdf.jpg)
In this issue:
- Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
- Research: The most recent DR data
- Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
- Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
- DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
- Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
- Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?
--The Olive Branch 19:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Banting and Best Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Hi Pigman, I recently pushed a new article which was promptly nominated for speedy deletion. I've only been with Wikipedia for a year or so now so am still learning the ropes. I'm wondering if you could lend a hand in cleaning up the article?
The article was titled: Banting and Best Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
Let me know if you need more info from me.
Thanks, Max Editormax3 (talk) 17:13, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Theresa Spence's hunger strike
I meant to leave you a note, but got sidetracked and never got back it.
Good to see Theresa Spence is being worked on. I'd seen some of the news on her.
At this point, I don't believe her strike meets the inclusion criteria for the article. She's getting a great deal of attention as recent news, but it's too early to see if it will have any long-term notability. Most importantly, there's been no results from the strike beyond the publicity. This is the key criteria that we've been using at Hunger strike to prevent it from becoming a listing of all hunger strikes, instead of an article about hunger strikes that highlights a few extremely notable ones.
Take a look at the talk page discussions and article history. The criteria is working, but not without occasional confusion. There's support for creating a separate list of notable hunger strikes, but I don't think anyone has tried starting it. It'll likely be a very long list, but it should be manageable if constrained to strikes already mentioned in other articles. --Ronz (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2012 (UTC)