User talk:65.184.17.216: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:11, 25 May 2006

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and write articles, however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 65.184.17.216). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can type {{helpme}} on this page and an experienced Wikipedian will be around to answer any questions you may have.

Please note these points:

Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
Please use a neutral point of view to edit the article; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do that.
Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted texts, advertisement messages, and texts that are not related to that article. Both adding such unreasonable information and editing articles maliciously are considered vandalism. A user who repeatedly vandalises articles will be blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on [[User talk:{{{1}}}|my Talk page]] – I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia.

from Wikipedian: Justin Eiler 04:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Wicca

Greetings,

The link that you removed is an important view of Wicca within the Christian community--and while it's a "minority view," it is one that I wish more Christians would emulate. As such, the link is directed to Christians about Wiccans: it is not intended to "convert" Wiccans.

If you have doubts about an article or link, it can help to discuss changes on the talk page before making a change. Yeah, that's kind of a contradiction of Wikipedia:Be bold, but it can also help to make sure that changes are something that everyone can agree with. Justin Eiler 04:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PROD tag on USSA

You put a PROD tag on USSA which I firmly disagree with. USSA is a valid disambiguation page. Feel free to take this to WP:AfD if you wish. DarthVad e r 03:05, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it is not appropriate to Prod a disambiguation page. Gwernol 03:28, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but if you believe th articles themselves should be deleted, please nominate the articles, not the disambiguation page. At most that would be nominated after the articles have been deleted by consensus. Also, please read the prod rules which clearly state:

"Contested deletions: If anyone, including the article's creator, removes Template:Prod from an article for any reason, do not put it back. If you still believe the article needs to be deleted, list it on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion."

If you want to continue with this proposed deletion, please take this to the AfD process, but do not re-apply the Prod tag. Thanks, Gwernol 03:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

In response to this: [1], the policy page for PROD says: "If you do not agree that the article should be deleted without discussion: Remove the {{dated prod}} tag from the article, and optionally try to address the concerns of the tagging editor". I removed the {{dated prod}} tag from the page in accordance with the policy. I am happy to discuss why this disambiguation page should not be deleted if necessary. DarthVad e r 03:37, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um, you added the talk page after the edit summary that claimed I should have read the talk page. I may be good but I'm afraid time travel is not among my talents. By the way I've left a comment on the talk page. Gwernol 03:56, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Note on Cumberland County, Pennsylvania

I reverted the link change from http://www.ccna.net to http://www.gocarlisle.com — the latter goes to a generic template site that is not in fact related to Cumberland County. The former still seems to be the correct current website. —PaperTruths 23:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. :) Maybe the thing to do would be to wait until the site goes live before changing the link? I'm not sure. It's a judgment call, in any case, so either way you want to play it is probably fine. (Though I can't say for sure, not being a particularly experienced Wikipedian.) Thanks for getting back to me! —PaperTruths 23:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry...

...but even if you are an admin that isn't logged in, it's against policy to block someone you're in a dispute with. Regards. —Khoikhoi 00:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And btw, you know what the three-revert rule is, right? —Khoikhoi 00:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie Adams

Your recent comments on Talk:Stephanie Adams are unacceptable per the WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL policies. If you cannot express your concerns in a civilized manner you will likely be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you, Gw e rnol 00:06, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. Gw e rnol 00:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 Your recent comments on [[Talk:Stephanie Adams]] are unacceptable per the [[WP:NPA]] and [[WP:CIVIL]] policies. If you cannot express your concerns in a civilized manner you will likely be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you, [[User:gwernol|Gw]][[User:gwernol/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:gwernol|rnol]] 00:06, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
+[[Image:Stop hand.svg|left|30px]]
+This is your '''last warning'''. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for disruption.<!-- Template:Npa3 --> <!-- This noinclude may not be honored in some cases.  Bug? -->  [[User:gwernol|Gw]][[User:gwernol/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:gwernol|rnol]] 00:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)