User talk:TheSyndromeOfaDown: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:53, 24 May 2013

Welcome!

Hello, TheSyndromeOfaDown, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -TFD (talk) 03:26, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to San Francisco International Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC) [reply]

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Jonathan Yip (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. HkCaGu (talk) 17:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC) [reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 00:52, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheSyndromeOfaDown (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you run a check-user (not to mention compare the writing styles) you'll see that I'm not Jonathon Yip TheSyndromeOfaDown (talk) 00:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"I'll admit I'm up to no good, but I'm not Jonathan Yip. Since the jig is up, I'll admit I am a sock, but not of Jonathan Yip." Self-admitted sock? Check. Admitted attempt to disrupt? Check. Unblock declined. Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 18:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I know this page is being watched. If you check my history you'll see that I largely do not edit aviation/transportation articles. Most of my contributions have been military history (the US war in Afghanistan) and on the Amy's Baking Company page. Don't take my word for it, run the SPI. TheSyndromeOfaDown (talk) 01:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry TSOaD, but that is BS. Look at your very own contributions. Just remember that the fate of this account is in that Checkuser. WorldTraveller101^{(Trouble?/My Work)} 02:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should look at them as well. I'll give you a hint as to who I really am - did Jonathan Yip ever call for an ANI investigation of user Steelbeard1 - check out ANI incident archive 797 item 66 wikihounding. I'll admit I'm up to no good, but I'm not Jonathan Yip. Since the jig is up, I'll admit I am a sock, but not of Jonathan Yip. If you check the ANI board from May 20ish and Steelbeard1's page, you'll see who I am. I'm also the disassembler (human beings were completely disassembled) and the creator of the "Jerry Sandusky Barnstar" as well as the "Manliness Award". Let's give credit where credit is due. TheSyndromeOfaDown (talk) 14:34, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'll tell you that this account will never be used again. Unfortunately, I don't believe you. I still think you're a Yip sock. A Checkuser will be "inspecting" in the next few days. I'll put it to you at this: you might have talk page access revoked soon if you don't stop posting this type of things. The fact is, no one can trust your posts, considering what you just admitted. Regrets, WorldTraveller101^{(Trouble?/My Work)} 17:03, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editors may have noticed my complaints about the bad edits to four articles which I reverted. Of course, the editor in question deleted my complaints. Steelbeard1 (talk) 18:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He's blocked indefinitely, so nothing else will happen really. The SPI case will determine whether or not he is lying about the Jonathan Yip bit, but if it is positive, then he will likely be banned. Somehow, this could in theory, be a shared account used by multiple banned users. Not sure it is likely, but it is indeed possible. Thanks, Steel. WorldTraveller101^{(Trouble?/My Work)} 19:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome and thank you, WT101. BTW, TSoaD accused me of wikihounding him. That is false. All the edits I complained to him about are regarding articles I follow. Steelbeard1 (talk) 20:28, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright fuck this. TheSyndromeOfaDown, you better just tell who your "true" sockpuppeteer and get it overwith. This is bullshit. I'm not interested in playing games. You already have the possibility of you and your sockmaster getting indefinite site-bans, so just fess up. You've exhausted my patience. WorldTraveller101^{(Trouble?/My Work)} 21:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 :::::He's blocked indefinitely, so nothing else will happen really. The SPI case will determine whether or not he is lying about the Jonathan Yip bit, but if it is positive, then he will likely be banned. Somehow, this '''could''' in theory, be a shared account used by '''multiple''' banned users. Not sure it is likely, but it is indeed possible. Thanks, Steel. '''[[User:WorldTraveller101|WorldTraveller101]]<sup>([[User talk:WorldTraveller101|Trouble?]]/[[Special:Contributions/WorldTraveller101|My Work]])</sup>''' 19:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 ::::::You're welcome and thank you, WT101.  BTW, TSoaD accused me of wikihounding him.  That is false. All the edits I complained to him about are regarding articles I follow. [[User:Steelbeard1|Steelbeard1]] ([[User talk:Steelbeard1|talk]]) 20:28, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
+Alright fuck this. TheSyndromeOfaDown, you '''better''' just tell who your "true" sockpuppeteer and get it overwith. This is bullshit. I'm not interested in playing games. You already have the possibility of you and your sockmaster getting indefinite site-bans, so just fess up. You've exhausted my patience. '''[[User:WorldTraveller101|WorldTraveller101]]<sup>([[User talk:WorldTraveller101|Trouble?]]/[[Special:Contributions/WorldTraveller101|My Work]])</sup>''' 21:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)