User talk:Mrt3366: Difference between revisions
→Stop: Done |
|||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
::*[[Islamic terrorism]] |
::*[[Islamic terrorism]] |
||
::One after the other, and you say you ''didn't'' even see [[Saffron Terror]]? You really should have sought a better excuse. [[User:Mrt3366|<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="brown">Mr</font><font face="verdana" color="red"> T</font>]][[User talk:Mrt3366|<font size="1"><sup>(Talk?)</sup></font>]] <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:Mrt3366|action=edit§ion=new&preload=User_talk:Mrt3366/new_section}} <font color="green"><sup>(New thread?)</sup></font>]</span> 11:31, 27 May 2013 (UTC) |
::One after the other, and you say you ''didn't'' even see [[Saffron Terror]]? You really should have sought a better excuse. [[User:Mrt3366|<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="brown">Mr</font><font face="verdana" color="red"> T</font>]][[User talk:Mrt3366|<font size="1"><sup>(Talk?)</sup></font>]] <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:Mrt3366|action=edit§ion=new&preload=User_talk:Mrt3366/new_section}} <font color="green"><sup>(New thread?)</sup></font>]</span> 11:31, 27 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
:::No, I clicked on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2002_Gujarat_violence&diff=prev&oldid=556981311 diff], saw you had added an inappropriate see alos and reverted it. That is not an "excuse" it is the facts of the matter. Now you can correct your misrepresentation on Ed's talk page or not, I personally am going back to editing and creating Anti-Muslim pogroms in India. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines|talk]]) 11:38, 27 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:38, 27 May 2013
Date: Saturday, September 7. Time: 01 hrs 55 min(s) 43 second(s) (UTC)
Just a thought
May be we can stop the discussion about the controversy thing as of now, there are discussions on other forums, may be we can take it up on article talk page when those discussions either get results or get archived without any reults.-sarvajna (talk) 11:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanx for the welcome!! I just looked at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Politics,_government,_and_law and saw there are two comments for Modi.
The first comment cannot be read (and clicking on edit, I saw it was yours).--MarcbelaD (talk) 13:34, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
I became aware of this controversy and article only because of the link above. The formatting of the table is wrong there and should be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarcbelaD (talk • contribs) 14:09, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Reliable Sources Noticeboard
I threw in my two cents about your question at Reliable Sources for what it is worth. You'll find it here! Crtew (talk) 10:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Notification
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
- Note: This notification comes here after the discussion that happened at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#What_I_would_really_like. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- I fully supported your decision to delete these names on the list here. Please let me know if you get any flack. Crtew (talk) 08:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, thank you, I appreciate your concern, I will notify you about any further development! DS is getting out of control. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 09:19, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- I fully supported your decision to delete these names on the list here. Please let me know if you get any flack. Crtew (talk) 08:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Stop
Misrepresenting what I have done, this is a blatently false assertion. I reverted your addition of that see also. I had not seen the one to Saffron terror, which belongs there as it was hindu nationalists who carried out the pogrom. I did not re-add Anti- Muslim pogroms in India as I was reverting your addition of an inappropriate see also. Kindly rectify your misrepresentation of my edit. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:25, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- "I reverted your addition of that see also." - is that an excuse? You should have done more than just blindly reverting me. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 11:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- You didn't see Saffron Terror!?!! It was like:
- One after the other, and you say you didn't even see Saffron Terror? You really should have sought a better excuse. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 11:31, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- No, I clicked on the diff, saw you had added an inappropriate see alos and reverted it. That is not an "excuse" it is the facts of the matter. Now you can correct your misrepresentation on Ed's talk page or not, I personally am going back to editing and creating Anti-Muslim pogroms in India. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:38, 27 May 2013 (UTC)