User talk:Mrt3366: Difference between revisions
→*sigh*: wait |
→*sigh*: formal notification of potential sanctions |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
*I can get my block stick out and start escalating blocks until you both get indeffed. And to be fair to you since DS is ahead of you on the escalating block I'll start you both off on a month. |
*I can get my block stick out and start escalating blocks until you both get indeffed. And to be fair to you since DS is ahead of you on the escalating block I'll start you both off on a month. |
||
The alternative is for you to negotiate a way of working with each other that doesn't involve squabbling in a way that my 9 year old is too mature to engage in. This is pretty much your last chance to sort this out yourself. Please take it and don't wait for me or the community to resolve this for you as I assure you that you won't like how that ends up. Thank you. [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 19:15, 21 June 2013 (UTC) |
The alternative is for you to negotiate a way of working with each other that doesn't involve squabbling in a way that my 9 year old is too mature to engage in. This is pretty much your last chance to sort this out yourself. Please take it and don't wait for me or the community to resolve this for you as I assure you that you won't like how that ends up. Thank you. [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 19:15, 21 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Formal Notification of Possible RFAR related sanctions== |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
| image = yes |
|||
| The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to [[India]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Afghanistan]]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], satisfy any [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standard of behavior]], or follow any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision|Final decision]]" section of the decision page. |
|||
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]], with the appropriate sections of [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures]], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> |
|||
| valign = center |
|||
| [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|35px|alt=|link=]] |
|||
}}[[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 19:25, 21 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:25, 21 June 2013
Date: Friday, August 30. Time: 01 hrs 46 min(s) 39 second(s) (UTC)
June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2002 Gujarat violence may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- strongly disputed as Gujarat did not have a State Commission for Women to act on the ground.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fisiusa.org/fisi_News_items/Godhra/godhra093.htm |title={{Wayback|df=
- in the state." The tone of their most recent report was reported by the Tribune as "lenient".[http://www.tribuneindia.com/2002/20020426/main5.htm NCM rejects Gujarat report:Directs state to
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:04, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello!
70.181.68.226 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Hello! Here's a cookie. I also have a question. Why is your username "MrT" 3366? --70.181.68.226 (talk) 21:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
- That number, or something about it rather, holds a deep sentimental significance for me. Thanks for the cookie. I like it. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 06:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Welcome. And I was talking about the Mr T part, not the 3366 part. But it's fine. :) --70.181.68.226 (talk) 14:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
ANEW, again
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:33, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
*sigh*
Everywhere I turn these days I'm seeing one or the other of you and DS reporting/complaining about the other. I'm quite fed up with this and this has to come to an end now as its disrupting and distracting for other editors. There are 3 ways this can go:
- I can start full protecting every article you squable over until you see sense
- I can impose an adminstrative sanction to prevent you editing the same article or allowing an admin to expel you from any argument you are fighting over or
- I can get my block stick out and start escalating blocks until you both get indeffed. And to be fair to you since DS is ahead of you on the escalating block I'll start you both off on a month.
The alternative is for you to negotiate a way of working with each other that doesn't involve squabbling in a way that my 9 year old is too mature to engage in. This is pretty much your last chance to sort this out yourself. Please take it and don't wait for me or the community to resolve this for you as I assure you that you won't like how that ends up. Thank you. Spartaz Humbug! 19:15, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Formal Notification of Possible RFAR related sanctions
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.