Jump to content

User talk:Imzadi1979: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs)
Reverts (rollback): new section
Line 25: Line 25:
</div>
</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0577 -->
<!-- EdwardsBot 0577 -->

== Reverts (rollback) ==

Edits such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Today%27s_featured_article/requests/instructions&diff=564852914&oldid=564852408 this] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Today%27s_featured_article/requests/instructions&diff=564099156&oldid=564098484 this] are quite troubling. When you were given the rollback user right, it was expected that this be used only to revert vandalism. PSky's edits, though against consensus and undoubtedly controversial, did not fit this definition. Could you please exercise more restraint? Otherwise I or another admin may have to remove the user right.&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 02:26, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:26, 19 July 2013


Welcome to the talk page of

Imzadi1979

If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page.

Please start a new talk page thread either by clicking the New section link above or using the box below. This will make sure that the edit summary that appears on watchlists accurately shows your edit as a new topic, and not related to another topic. Thank you.

"Imzadi1979 (public)" is an alternate account for use on public computers.



    Post a message to my talk page    
Archives
Threads older than seven days after the last reply will be archived. Thank you.

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

Reverts (rollback)

Edits such as this and this are quite troubling. When you were given the rollback user right, it was expected that this be used only to revert vandalism. PSky's edits, though against consensus and undoubtedly controversial, did not fit this definition. Could you please exercise more restraint? Otherwise I or another admin may have to remove the user right. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:26, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]