This user has autopatrolled rights on the English Wikipedia.
Email this user
This user has file mover rights on the English Wikipedia
This user has MassMessage sender rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has template editor rights on the English Wikipedia.

User talk:Imzadi1979

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Imzadi1979's talk page!
If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page,
then place {{talkback|Imzadi1979}} on your talk.

Note: Please start a new talk page thread either by clicking the New section link above or using the box below. This will make sure that the edit summary that appears on watchlists accurately shows your edit as a new topic, and not related to another topic. Thank you.

Note #2: "Imzadi1979 (public)" is an alternate account for use on public computers.

    Post a new message    

Threads older than seven days after the last reply will be archived. Thank you.

US 31 Muskegon[edit]

Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Road_junction_lists#What_to_include says to include "All grade-separated interchanges, without exception". I fail to see how that is not a grade-separated interchange. Webster Avenue passes under BUS US 31 northbound, making this a half-Y interchange. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:23, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

@TenPoundHammer: that crossing is at-grade. If you zoom in on the satellite view far enough, you can clearly see the stop lines on the "ramp" from southbound Bus. US 31 to Webster Avenue where the "ramp" crossing northbound Bus. US 31. This is confirmed by looking at Google Street View, so no, it's not a half-Y interchange. Imzadi 1979  07:48, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
You're looking at the wrong one. I'm talking about the other intersection on the other side of downtown Muskegon. As seen here, Webster Avenue clearly passes under BUS US 31. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 20:12, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
I still wouldn't include it. That's not really an interchange, not in the spirit of what the guideline intends. Imzadi 1979  20:59, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


You win, I'm never touching that article again. If this is actually standard for road articles, I'm glad I never got involved beyond I-840, as these are (IMO) very poor, redundant layout choices. Cheers. Huntster (t @ c) 08:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

There's no competition, Huntster, however we have used the smaller infobox in history sections. For example, take a look at M-553 (Michigan highway), a featured article that uses one for its predecessor designation, CR 553, and has a related highway (M-554) with its own small infobox in the appropriate section. I agree that it didn't need its own subsection, which is why I shifted it up. That article still needs a route description written, which, if put in the conventional location ahead of the history, would separate the small box from the main one at the top. Imzadi 1979  23:13, 21 August 2016 (UTC)