Talk:Viscount de São Jorge: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with 'The reference to the title in a false way was done already in Wikipédia in prejudice of the actual representative of the title on the page of Wikipedia Viscon...' |
some thoughts |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In this page there are ofensive references to Dr.Guilherme Manuel de Souza Girão, which the present article consider inadequated. We consider that the article has been modified in order to enclose the historical references about the facts mentioned in the same article. |
In this page there are ofensive references to Dr.Guilherme Manuel de Souza Girão, which the present article consider inadequated. We consider that the article has been modified in order to enclose the historical references about the facts mentioned in the same article. |
||
:I see. Instead of creating a completely new essay, the right way would have been to correct the existing article [[Visconde de São Jorge]] with [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. We don't present two opposing opinions on two pages but try to show both sides of the medal in a single article. Your answer makes me also wonder if you are somehow involved with Mr de Souza Girão. In this case you should read [[WP:COI|this guideline]] about possible conflicts of interest. And while the deletion discussion is still ongoing you should probably also present your arguments over there. This talk page is less likely to be viewed by uninvolved editors who might want to comment. [[User:De728631|De728631]] ([[User talk:De728631|talk]]) 17:14, 12 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:14, 12 October 2013
The reference to the title in a false way was done already in Wikipédia in prejudice of the actual representative of the title on the page of Wikipedia Visconde_de_São_Jorge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visconde_de_S%C3%A3o_Jorge
In this page there are ofensive references to Dr.Guilherme Manuel de Souza Girão, which the present article consider inadequated. We consider that the article has been modified in order to enclose the historical references about the facts mentioned in the same article.
- I see. Instead of creating a completely new essay, the right way would have been to correct the existing article Visconde de São Jorge with reliable sources. We don't present two opposing opinions on two pages but try to show both sides of the medal in a single article. Your answer makes me also wonder if you are somehow involved with Mr de Souza Girão. In this case you should read this guideline about possible conflicts of interest. And while the deletion discussion is still ongoing you should probably also present your arguments over there. This talk page is less likely to be viewed by uninvolved editors who might want to comment. De728631 (talk) 17:14, 12 October 2013 (UTC)