Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Harris (public servant): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
weak keep
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Academics and educators|list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Northamerica1000|Northamerica1000]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|(talk)]]</sup> 01:04, 7 November 2013 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Academics and educators|list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Northamerica1000|Northamerica1000]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|(talk)]]</sup> 01:04, 7 November 2013 (UTC)</small>
*'''Weak keep'''. As an academic, his citation numbers are only in the low double digits, not enough to convince me of a pass of [[WP:PROF]]. But I just added several newspaper sources for his work at the electoral commission and in several international capacities since then. Although none of these have much in the way of detail about Harris (hence the weakness of my keep !vote), I think these roles may have a high enough profile to make the article worth saving. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 02:17, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
*'''Weak keep'''. As an academic, his citation numbers are only in the low double digits, not enough to convince me of a pass of [[WP:PROF]]. But I just added several newspaper sources for his work at the electoral commission and in several international capacities since then. Although none of these have much in the way of detail about Harris (hence the weakness of my keep !vote), I think these roles may have a high enough profile to make the article worth saving. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 02:17, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
::'''Keep''' played important role in development of NZ's MMP electoral system.[[User:Rick570|Rick570]] ([[User talk:Rick570|talk]]) 02:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:52, 13 November 2013

Paul Harris (public servant) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:04, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:04, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. As an academic, his citation numbers are only in the low double digits, not enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF. But I just added several newspaper sources for his work at the electoral commission and in several international capacities since then. Although none of these have much in the way of detail about Harris (hence the weakness of my keep !vote), I think these roles may have a high enough profile to make the article worth saving. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:17, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep played important role in development of NZ's MMP electoral system.Rick570 (talk) 02:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]