Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John McSoriley: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Relisting debate
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:SarahStierch|SarahStierch]] ([[User talk:SarahStierch|talk]]) 18:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:SarahStierch|SarahStierch]] ([[User talk:SarahStierch|talk]]) 18:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
<hr style="width:55%;" />
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:'''Keep''' important New Zealand legislative interpreter for lawmakers.[[User:Rick570|Rick570]] ([[User talk:Rick570|talk]]) 04:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:18, 23 November 2013

John McSoriley

John McSoriley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage about him in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 18:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep important New Zealand legislative interpreter for lawmakers.Rick570 (talk) 04:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]