Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John McSoriley: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Relisting debate |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:SarahStierch|SarahStierch]] ([[User talk:SarahStierch|talk]]) 18:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:SarahStierch|SarahStierch]] ([[User talk:SarahStierch|talk]]) 18:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
||
:'''Keep''' important New Zealand legislative interpreter for lawmakers.[[User:Rick570|Rick570]] ([[User talk:Rick570|talk]]) 04:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:18, 23 November 2013
John McSoriley
- John McSoriley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Lacks coverage about him in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Lack of third-party coverage, fails WP:GNG. Not notable as a writer or public official. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:03, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 18:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep important New Zealand legislative interpreter for lawmakers.Rick570 (talk) 04:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)