Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olatunde olalekan: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
seeking consensus
Barek (talk | contribs)
format for easier review
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
*'''Delete''' Article was speedily deleted under A7 twice today and recreated each time. The subject is clearly non notable and this probably could be speedily deleted under A7 again, but will just let the AfD run to completion instead. [[User:Safiel|Safiel]] ([[User talk:Safiel|talk]]) 03:53, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Article was speedily deleted under A7 twice today and recreated each time. The subject is clearly non notable and this probably could be speedily deleted under A7 again, but will just let the AfD run to completion instead. [[User:Safiel|Safiel]] ([[User talk:Safiel|talk]]) 03:53, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
::'''Comment''' I would prefer that we achieve consensus.[[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#00ff00"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#bb00bb">cierekim''' </font>]] 03:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
::'''Comment''' I would prefer that we achieve consensus.[[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#00ff00"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#bb00bb">cierekim''' </font>]] 03:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
:::I'm fine with getting an AfD consensus; but for reference, variations on the subject have been deleted under multiple article names - some of which are now create protected. See:
:::*{{la|Olatunde olalekan isaac}}
:::*{{la|Olatunde Olalekan Isaac}}
:::*{{la|Olatunde O Isaac}}
:::*{{la|Olatunde isaac}}
:::--- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 04:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:20, 2 December 2013

Olatunde olalekan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable scientist. have not been able to find sources. removed dead links that did not provide sourcing. de-prodded Dlohcierekim 02:49, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:07, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:07, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Article was speedily deleted under A7 twice today and recreated each time. The subject is clearly non notable and this probably could be speedily deleted under A7 again, but will just let the AfD run to completion instead. Safiel (talk) 03:53, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would prefer that we achieve consensus. Dlohcierekim 03:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm fine with getting an AfD consensus; but for reference, variations on the subject have been deleted under multiple article names - some of which are now create protected. See:
--- Barek (talkcontribs) - 04:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]