User talk:Roberthall7: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:20, 11 December 2013

Welcome!

Hello, Roberthall7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Art in Action Hi Roberthall7 I have seen your reversions of Sannacott's edits and your note to him. Please justify this and explain what in particular you are objecting to. As far as I can see, Sannacott was bringing this page up to date. wikirpg (talk) 13:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You know perfectly well that the paragraph in question, and its verifiable reference, was unilaterally ripped out by Sannacott more than once without discussion. That does not characterise bringing something "up to date" as you describe it. That characterizes vandalism, which Wikiepdia takes extremely seriously. As such, your depiction of Sannacott's edits are conspicuous and will be included in any vandalism alert if I make one. That said, Sannacott has since made a compromise edit more in keeping with Wikipedia's ethos of collegiality, so we have stepped back from the brink for the time being. -Roberthall7 (talk) 11:32, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. You have still lost me. Is it the bit about ownership of Waterperry or the bit about volunteers and charging entrance? These are the only bits I can see that you could be objecting to. As I see it, the charging bit placed where it was looked like opinion/inuendo rather than facts in the true spirit of Wikipedia. The ownership bit I am sure could be verified but appears rather unbalanced in the opening paragraph. Bringing it "up to date" is a reference to Sannacott's changes of year/event which had been removed in the reversions. Hopefully everyone is happy with what appears now. wikirpg (talk) 13:09, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

School of Economic Science

Hi Roberthall7, I've made a comment on the talk page. Skyring/Pete should not be deleting sourced content. Feel free to ping me on my talk page and remind me to join the discussion if I forget. Thanks, -- — Keithbob • Talk • 16:20, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 Hi again. You have still lost me. Is it the bit about ownership of Waterperry or the bit about volunteers and charging entrance? These are the only bits I can see that you could be objecting to. As I see it, the charging bit placed where it was looked like opinion/inuendo rather than facts in the true spirit of Wikipedia. The ownership bit I am sure could be verified but appears rather unbalanced in the opening paragraph. Bringing it "up to date" is a reference to Sannacott's changes of year/event which had been removed in the reversions. Hopefully everyone is happy with what appears now. [[User:Wikirpg|wikirpg]] ([[User talk:Wikirpg|talk]]) 13:09, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
+==[[School of Economic Science]]==
+Hi Roberthall7, I've made a comment on the talk page. Skyring/Pete should not be deleting sourced content. Feel free to ping me on my talk page and remind me to join the discussion if I forget. Thanks, --<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — [[User:Keithbob|<b style= "color:#090;"><i>Keithbob</i></b>]] • [[User_ talk:Keithbob|<span style="color:#075;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 16:20, 11 December 2013 (UTC)