Talk:Freedomain Radio

Notability

As a stand alone article, this does not have much potential. Too much of it is simply a SPS listing of the various guests. Note, the previous article page was deleted back on 12:57, 31 December 2006 by NawlinWiki (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). While 7 years of podcasts may have expanded the listing of guests, etc., I do not think this fact saves the article. It should be restored to its redirect function. – S. Rich (talk) 17:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm forced to agree. There is basically one source in the article that is actually about the show, and its a very critical source (edit) and basing an article on it would result in a very skewed article(/edit). The rest is WP:SPS WP:PRIMARY and the selection of which of the thousands of shows to talk about is WP:OR. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. Let's see what @Truther2012: & @Netoholic: have to say. – S. Rich (talk) 17:44, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

If you want other opinions, it would be a good idea to avoid the appearance of canvassing by posting a broad solicitation on the Molyneux talk page. I believe there's additional content in various sections of the Molyneux article which would be more appropriately located here. There are RS discussions of FDR content and controversies which would tend to support notability. SPECIFICO talk 18:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm confused, SPECIFICO, what was the point of pulling all this info out of Molynuex' article and plopping it here, just to declare this article un-notable? If the show does not meet notability requirements, we should kill this article and move all the related material back to the main article. Personally, I would prefer to keep this article and clean the other one.

Gaijin42, it is not OR, when only a few notable guests with their own articles are selected. The article gives no implication as to why or how those guests were selected --TRUTHER2012 21:23, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

@Truther2012:It was Gaijin who tagged this article, not I. See my comment above. SPECIFICO talk 22:01, 6 June 2014 (UTC)