Jump to content

Talk:Jeff Dexter: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
a bit of sun might help
Line 1: Line 1:


* There is no doubt that Dexter is notable enough to merit an article. The fact that an earlier article [[Jeff Dexter]] was deleted was due to editorial neglect. It can be found [http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/Jeff_Dexter_(deleted_11_Feb_2008_at_22:26) here]. I believe this article, once brought up to speed, should be moved to [[Jeff Dexter]]. 19:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
* There is no doubt that Dexter is notable enough to merit an article. The fact that an earlier article [[Jeff Dexter]] was deleted was due to editorial neglect. It can be found [http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/Jeff_Dexter_(deleted_11_Feb_2008_at_22:26) here]. I believe this article, once brought up to speed, should be moved to [[Jeff Dexter]]. 19:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
::Apparently it has. But what's with the photo of the guy? I've heard of pasty Brits but this guy looks like an automaton. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 08:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)


{{Template:Did you know nominations/Jeff Dexter}}
{{Template:Did you know nominations/Jeff Dexter}}

Revision as of 08:28, 14 July 2014

  • There is no doubt that Dexter is notable enough to merit an article. The fact that an earlier article Jeff Dexter was deleted was due to editorial neglect. It can be found here. I believe this article, once brought up to speed, should be moved to Jeff Dexter. 19:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Apparently it has. But what's with the photo of the guy? I've heard of pasty Brits but this guy looks like an automaton. EEng (talk) 08:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]